Abstract
Background: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and the survival outcomes of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) patients compared to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) patients according to their molecular subtype.Methods: We compared the clinicopathological characteristics, breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with IDC (n = 14,547) and ILC (n = 528).Results: The ILC presented with a larger tumor size, more advanced cancer stage, increased rate of hormonal receptor positivity, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) negativity and mastectomy than the IDC. The ILC patients more frequently presented with the luminal A subtype, whereas the IDC patients more frequently presented with the luminal B, HER2-overexpression, or triple negative subtype. The BCSS and OS were not significantly different between the IDC and ILC for each molecular subtype.Conclusions: Similar to IDC patients, molecular subtype should be considered when determining the prognosis and treatment regimen for ILC patients.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 56 |
| Journal | World Journal of Surgical Oncology |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 13 Mar 2014 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The statistical consultation was supported by the Catholic Research Coordinating Center of the Korea Health 21 R&D Project (A070001), Ministry of Health and Welfare Republic of Korea.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Breast cancer-specific survival
- Invasive ductal carcinoma
- Invasive lobular carcinoma
- Molecular subtype
- Overall survival
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of the clinical outcomes of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast according to molecular subtype in a Korean population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver