A comparison of the short-term outcomes of simple and complex segmentectomy via uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Background: Performing complex segmentectomy via uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a more demanding and intricate procedure than simple segmentectomy or lobectomy. Thus, the aim of our study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of uniportal VATS complex segmentectomy compared to uniportal VATS simple segmentectomy by investigating surgical outcomes of patients undergoing those procedures. Methods: We conducted a review of medical records for all patients who underwent uniportal VATS segmentectomy for lung cancer from May 2019 to February 2023. The characteristics of the patients and tumors, as well as the operative and postoperative outcomes, were compared between the group of patients who underwent simple segmentectomy and the group who underwent complex segmentectomy. Results: Among 199 patients, 67 underwent simple segmentectomy through uniportal VATS, while 132 patients received complex segmentectomy through the same technique. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding patient and tumor characteristics, operative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes, except for the surgical margin distances. Uniportal VATS complex segmentectomy resulted in shorter duration of postoperative stay (6 vs. 7 days, P=0.0116) but a closer surgical margin distance (20 vs. 22 mm, P=0.0175). Conclusions: Our study supports the use of uniportal VATS complex segmentectomy as a safe and feasible treatment option compared to uniportal VATS simple segmentectomy for patients with clinical stage 1A non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it is important to note that a short resection margin is probable in complex segmentectomy cases. Therefore, the location of the tumor should be thoroughly evaluated when performing uniportal VATS complex segmentectomy.