Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A randomized, open-label, Phase III clinical trial of nivolumab vs. therapy of investigator's choice in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A subanalysis of Asian patients versus the global population in checkmate 141

  • Naomi Kiyota
  • , Yasuhisa Hasegawa
  • , Shunji Takahashi
  • , Tomoya Yokota
  • , Chia Jui Yen
  • , Shigemichi Iwae
  • , Yasushi Shimizu
  • , Ruey Long Hong
  • , Masahiro Goto
  • , Jin Hyoung Kang
  • , Wing Sum Kenneth Li
  • , Robert L. Ferris
  • , Maura Gillison
  • , Yoshinobu Namba
  • , Manish Monga
  • , Mark Lynch
  • , Makoto Tahara
  • Kobe University
  • Aichi Cancer Center Hospital and Research Institute
  • Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research
  • Shizuoka Cancer Center
  • National Cheng Kung University
  • Hyogo Cancer Center
  • Hokkaido University
  • National Taiwan University
  • Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Hong Kong
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Ohio State University
  • Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • National Cancer Center Japan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

89 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives To assess efficacy and safety of nivolumab versus investigator's choice of therapy (IC) in Asian patients with platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Materials and methods Thirty-four patients from Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Korea received nivolumab 3 mg/kg (n = 23) every 2 weeks or IC (n = 11), as part of a global trial (n = 361), until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results Median OS was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.1–NR) with nivolumab and 6.2 months (95% CI 2.6–NR) with IC. Seven (30.4%) patients receiving nivolumab and six (54.5%) receiving IC died. The hazard ratio (HR) for risk of death (nivolumab vs. IC) was 0.50 (95% CI 0.17–1.48). Median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI 1.6–7.5) with nivolumab and 1.8 months (95% CI 0.4–6.1) with IC (HR 0.57 [95% CI 0.25–1.33]). Objective response rates (complete + partial responses) were 26.1% (6/23 patients; 95% CI 10.2–48.4) for nivolumab and 0% (0/11 patients; 95% CI 0.0–28.5) for IC. Sixteen (69.6%) nivolumab-treated patients and 10 (90.9%) patients receiving IC had a treatment-related adverse event, most commonly decreased appetite (21.7%), pruritus, rash, and fatigue (17.4% each) with nivolumab, and nausea, stomatitis, and decreased appetite (27.3% each) with IC. Conclusion Nivolumab demonstrated a survival advantage compared with conventional treatments in Asian patients with platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic SCCHN, and was well tolerated. Clinical trial registration NCT02105636.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)138-146
Number of pages9
JournalOral Oncology
Volume73
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Asian
  • Nivolumab
  • Programmed death-1
  • Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized, open-label, Phase III clinical trial of nivolumab vs. therapy of investigator's choice in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A subanalysis of Asian patients versus the global population in checkmate 141'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this