A systematic review on radiologists' knowledge of breast cancer screening

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Mammography screening has been shown to reduce breast cancer mortality and remains the primary screening method. However, the harms of false-positive results and over-diagnosis have recently been emphasized, and screening guidelines have been revised. Breast ultrasonography screening has the advantage of detecting mammographically occult breast cancers in dense breasts; however, false-positive results and rising medical costs due to increased biopsy recommendations create a problem. Till date, recommendations for breast ultrasonography screenings have not been established. Magnetic resonance imaging is recommended for women at high risk and has excellent sensitivity, but it is expensive and inferior in accessibility. This article reviews the benefits, harms, and guidelines of methods commonly used in breast cancer screening. This review also provides breast cancer screening methods according to individual breast cancer risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-18
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology
Volume80
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Korean Society of Radiology.

Keywords

  • Breast
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Mammography
  • Ultrasonography, Mammary

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review on radiologists' knowledge of breast cancer screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this