A systematic review on radiologists' knowledge of breast cancer screening

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    2 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Mammography screening has been shown to reduce breast cancer mortality and remains the primary screening method. However, the harms of false-positive results and over-diagnosis have recently been emphasized, and screening guidelines have been revised. Breast ultrasonography screening has the advantage of detecting mammographically occult breast cancers in dense breasts; however, false-positive results and rising medical costs due to increased biopsy recommendations create a problem. Till date, recommendations for breast ultrasonography screenings have not been established. Magnetic resonance imaging is recommended for women at high risk and has excellent sensitivity, but it is expensive and inferior in accessibility. This article reviews the benefits, harms, and guidelines of methods commonly used in breast cancer screening. This review also provides breast cancer screening methods according to individual breast cancer risk.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)8-18
    Number of pages11
    JournalJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology
    Volume80
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 2019

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2019 The Korean Society of Radiology.

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Breast
    • Early Detection of Cancer
    • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    • Mammography
    • Ultrasonography, Mammary

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review on radiologists' knowledge of breast cancer screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this