Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Adjunctive Volasertib in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia not Eligible for Standard Induction Therapy: A Randomized, Phase 3 Trial

  • Hartmut Dohner
  • , Argiris Symeonidis
  • , Dries Deeren
  • , Judit Demeter
  • , Miguel A. Sanz
  • , Achilles Anagnostopoulos
  • , Jordi Esteve
  • , Walter Fiedler
  • , Kimmo Porkka
  • , Hee Je Kim
  • , Je Hwan Lee
  • , Kensuke Usuki
  • , Stefano D'Ardia
  • , Chul Won Jung
  • , Olga Salamero
  • , Heinz August Horst
  • , Christian Recher
  • , Philippe Rousselot
  • , Irwindeep Sandhu
  • , Koen Theunissen
  • Felicitas Thol, Konstanze Dohner, Veronica Teleanu, Daniel J. Deangelo, Tomoki Naoe, Mikkael A. Sekeres, Valerie Belsack, Miaomiao Ge, Tillmann Taube, Oliver G. Ottmann
  • Ulm University
  • University of Patras
  • AZ Delta
  • Semmelweis University
  • Hospital Universitario La Fe
  • General Hospital G. Papanikolaou
  • Hospital Clínic i Universitari
  • University of Hamburg
  • Helsinki University Hospital
  • University of Ulsan
  • Nippon Telegraph & Telephone
  • Azienda Ospedaliera - Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university
  • Hospital Vall d'Hebron
  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
  • CHU de Toulouse
  • Centre Hospitalier de Versailles
  • University of Alberta
  • Jessa Ziekenhuis
  • Hannover Medical School
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • SCS Boehringer Ingelheim Comm.V.
  • Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH
  • Goethe University Frankfurt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this phase 3 trial, older patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to receive the polo-like kinase inhibitor, volasertib (V; 350 mg intravenous on days 1 and 15 in 4-wk cycles), combined with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC; 20 mg subcutaneous, twice daily, days 1-10; n = 444), or LDAC plus placebo (P; n = 222). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Primary ORR analysis at recruitment completion included patients randomized ≥5 months beforehand; ORR was 25.2% for V+LDAC and 16.8% for P+LDAC (n = 371; odds ratio 1.66 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95-2.89]; P = 0.071). At final analysis (≥574 OS events), median OS was 5.6 months for V+LDAC and 6.5 months for P+LDAC (n = 666; hazard ratio 0.97 [95% CI, 0.8-1.2]; P = 0.757). The most common adverse events (AEs) were infections/infestations (grouped term; V+LDAC, 81.3%; P+LDAC, 63.5%) and febrile neutropenia (V+LDAC, 60.4%; P+LDAC, 29.3%). Fatal AEs occurred in 31.2% with V+LDAC versus 18.0% with P+LDAC, most commonly infections/infestations (V+LDAC, 17.1%; P+LDAC, 6.3%). Lack of OS benefit with V+LDAC versus P+LDAC may reflect increased early mortality with V+LDAC from myelosuppression and infections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E617
JournalHemaSphere
Volume5
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Aug 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adjunctive Volasertib in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia not Eligible for Standard Induction Therapy: A Randomized, Phase 3 Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this