Authorship and Inappropriate Authorship from an Ethical Publication Perspective

Sung Hun Kim, Jung Im Jung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Authorship is important for research integrity and publication ethics, acting as the basis for credit and academic achievement. Moreover, publication achievements have a significant impact on research grants and academic careers. Inappropriate authorship has been reported for several reasons, including complex interests and competitive environments. One form of this is representative authorship misuse, which includes honorary and ghost authorships. Kin co-authorship, such as parent-children authorship, is another form of inappropriate authorship that has recently emerged as a social problem in Korea. To address these issues, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) has established criteria for authorship. Similarly, many journals use the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) and Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) systems to prevent authorship misuse and systematically evaluate author credit and responsibility. Herein, this article reviews authorship and inappropriate authorship, as well as introduces methods to avoid authorship misuse.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)752-758
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology
Volume83
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Korean Society of Radiology.

Keywords

  • Academic Success
  • Authorship
  • Editorial Policies
  • Publishing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Authorship and Inappropriate Authorship from an Ethical Publication Perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this