Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancers: A multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III, noninferiority trial

  • S. T. Kim
  • , J. H. Kang
  • , J. Lee
  • , H. W. Lee
  • , S. Y. Oh
  • , J. S. Jang
  • , M. A. Lee
  • , B. S. Sohn
  • , S. Y. Yoon
  • , H. J. Choi
  • , J. H. Hong
  • , M. J. Kim
  • , S. Kim
  • , Y. S. Park
  • , J. O. Park
  • , H. Y. Lim
  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • Gyeongsang National University
  • Ajou University
  • Dong-A University
  • Chung-Ang University
  • Inje University
  • Konkuk University
  • Yonsei University
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

122 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) has shown modest activity and tolerable toxicity in a phase II trial for biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Meanwhile, gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX) has been the reference arm in recent phase II and III trials for BTCs. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of XELOX versus GEMOX as first-line therapy for advanced BCTs. Patients and methods: In this open-label, randomized, phase III, noninferiority trial, we randomly selected patients with metastatic BCTs to receive GEMOX (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1) or XELOX (capecitabine 1000 mg/m2, twice daily, on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1) as first-line treatment, given every 3 weeks, totaling eight cycles. The primary end point was to prove the noninferiority of XELOX to GEMOX in terms of 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Results: In total, 114 patients randomly received GEMOX and 108 randomly received XELOX. The median PFS was 5.3 months for the GEMOX group and 5.8 months for the XELOX group. The 6-month PFS rate was 44.5% for the GEMOX group and 46.7% for the XELOX group. The 95% confidence interval of the 6-month PFS rate difference between both groups was-12% to 16%, meeting the criteria for noninferiority of XELOX to GEMOX. There was no difference in objective response (P=0.171) and median overall survival (P=0.131) between both groups. The most common grade three to four adverse events were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. No patient died of treatment-related causes. The XELOX group had significantly lower frequencies of hospital visits than the GEMOX group (P<0.001). Conclusion: XELOX showed significant noninferiority to GEMOX in terms of 6-month PFS rate. Thus, XELOX could be an alternative first-line treatment of BCTs. Trial Registration: This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT01470443).

Original languageEnglish
Article numbermdz058
Pages (from-to)788-795
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Oncology
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • biliary tract cancer
  • capecitabine
  • gemcitabine
  • oxaliplatin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancers: A multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III, noninferiority trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this