Abstract
AIM: To compare survival between bile duct segmental resection (BDSR) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for treating distal bile duct cancers. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted for 45 patients in a BDSR group and for 149 patients in a PD group. RESULTS: The T-stage (P < 0.001), lymph node invasion (P = 0.010) and tumor differentiation (P = 0.005) were significant prognostic factors in the BDSR group. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates for the BDSR group and PD group were 51.7% and 36.6%, respectively and 46.0% and 38.1%, respectively (P = 0.099). The BDSR group and PD group did not show any significant difference in survival when this was adjusted for the TNM stage. The 3- and 5-year survival rates were: stage I a [BDSR (100.0% and 100.0%) vs PD (76.9% and 68.4%) (P = 0.226)]; stage I b [BDSR (55.8% and 32.6%) vs PD (59.3% and 59.3%) (P = 0.942)]; stage II b [BDSR (19.2% and 19.2%) vs PD (31.9% and 14.2%) (P = 0.669)]. CONCLUSION: BDSR can be justified as an alternative radical operation for patients with middle bile duct in selected patients with no adjacent organ invasion and resection margin is negative.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5966-5971 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | World Journal of Gastroenterology |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 47 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 21 Dec 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Bile duct cancer
- Pancreaticoduodenectomy
- Segmental resection
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Carcinoma of the middle bile duct: Is bile duct segmental resection appropriate?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver