TY - JOUR
T1 - Chronic Airways Assessment Test
T2 - psychometric properties in patients with asthma and/or COPD
AU - for the NOVELTY Scientific Community
AU - and the NOVELTY study investigators
AU - Tomaszewski, Erin L.
AU - Atkinson, Mark J.
AU - Janson, Christer
AU - Karlsson, Niklas
AU - Make, Barry
AU - Price, David
AU - Reddel, Helen K.
AU - Vogelmeier, Claus F.
AU - Müllerová, Hana
AU - Jones, Paul W.
AU - del Olmo, Ricardo
AU - Anderson, Gary
AU - Rabahi, Marcelo
AU - McIvor, Andrew
AU - Sadatsafavi, Mohsen
AU - Weinreich, Ulla
AU - Burgel, Pierre Régis
AU - Devouassoux, Gilles
AU - Papi, Alberto
AU - Inoue, Hiromasa
AU - Rendon, Adrian
AU - van den Berge, Maarten
AU - Beasley, Richard
AU - García-Navarro, Alvar Agustí
AU - Faner, Rosa
AU - Rivera, José Olaguibel
AU - Janson, Christer
AU - Bilińska-Izydorczyk, Magdalena
AU - Fagerås, Malin
AU - Fihn-Wikander, Titti
AU - Franzén, Stefan
AU - Keen, Christina
AU - Ostridge, Kristoffer
AU - Chalmers, James
AU - Harrison, Timothy
AU - Pavord, Ian
AU - Price, David
AU - Azim, Adnan
AU - Belton, Laura
AU - Blé, Francois Xavier
AU - Erhard, Clement
AU - Gairy, Kerry
AU - Hughes, Rod
AU - Lassi, Glenda
AU - Müllerová, Hana
AU - Rapsomaniki, Eleni
AU - Scott, Ian Christopher
AU - Chipps, Bradley
AU - Rhee, Chin Kook
AU - Yoon, Hyoung Kyu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12/1
Y1 - 2023/12/1
N2 - Background: No short patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments assess overall health status across different obstructive lung diseases. Thus, the wording of the introduction to the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) was modified to permit use in asthma and/or COPD. This tool is called the Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT). Methods: The psychometric properties of the CAAT were evaluated using baseline data from the NOVELTY study (NCT02760329) in patients with physician-assigned asthma, asthma + COPD or COPD. Analyses included exploratory/confirmatory factor analyses, differential item functioning and analysis of construct validity. Responses to the CAAT and CAT were compared in patients with asthma + COPD and those with COPD. Results: CAAT items were internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha: > 0.7) within each diagnostic group (n = 510). Models for structural and measurement invariance were strong. Tests of differential item functioning showed small differences between asthma and COPD in individual items, but these were not consistent in direction and had minimal overall impact on the total score. The CAAT and CAT were highly consistent when assessed in all NOVELTY patients who completed both (N = 277, Pearson’s correlation coefficient: 0.90). Like the CAT itself, CAAT scores correlated moderately (0.4–0.7) to strongly (> 0.7) with other PRO measures and weakly (< 0.4) with spirometry measures. Conclusions: CAAT scores appear to reflect the same health impairment across asthma and COPD, making the CAAT an appropriate PRO instrument for patients with asthma and/or COPD. Its brevity makes it suitable for use in clinical studies and routine clinical practice. Trial registration: NCT02760329.
AB - Background: No short patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments assess overall health status across different obstructive lung diseases. Thus, the wording of the introduction to the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) was modified to permit use in asthma and/or COPD. This tool is called the Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT). Methods: The psychometric properties of the CAAT were evaluated using baseline data from the NOVELTY study (NCT02760329) in patients with physician-assigned asthma, asthma + COPD or COPD. Analyses included exploratory/confirmatory factor analyses, differential item functioning and analysis of construct validity. Responses to the CAAT and CAT were compared in patients with asthma + COPD and those with COPD. Results: CAAT items were internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha: > 0.7) within each diagnostic group (n = 510). Models for structural and measurement invariance were strong. Tests of differential item functioning showed small differences between asthma and COPD in individual items, but these were not consistent in direction and had minimal overall impact on the total score. The CAAT and CAT were highly consistent when assessed in all NOVELTY patients who completed both (N = 277, Pearson’s correlation coefficient: 0.90). Like the CAT itself, CAAT scores correlated moderately (0.4–0.7) to strongly (> 0.7) with other PRO measures and weakly (< 0.4) with spirometry measures. Conclusions: CAAT scores appear to reflect the same health impairment across asthma and COPD, making the CAAT an appropriate PRO instrument for patients with asthma and/or COPD. Its brevity makes it suitable for use in clinical studies and routine clinical practice. Trial registration: NCT02760329.
KW - Asthma
KW - COPD
KW - COPD Assessment Test
KW - Chronic Airways Assessment Test
KW - Patient-reported
KW - Psychometrics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152065101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12931-023-02394-6
DO - 10.1186/s12931-023-02394-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 37031164
AN - SCOPUS:85152065101
SN - 1465-9921
VL - 24
JO - Respiratory Research
JF - Respiratory Research
IS - 1
M1 - 106
ER -