Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical Impact of Diabetes Mellitus After Intravascular Imaging–Guided PCI vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

  • Dong Hyun Gim
  • , Sang Yoon Lee
  • , Yang Hyun Cho
  • , Kiick Sung
  • , Wook Sung Kim
  • , Seung Jae Lee
  • , Woochan Kwon
  • , Jong Young Lee
  • , Seung Hun Lee
  • , Doosup Shin
  • , Sang Yeub Lee
  • , Sang Min Kim
  • , Kyeong Ho Yun
  • , Jae Young Cho
  • , Chan Joon Kim
  • , Hyo Suk Ahn
  • , Chang Wook Nam
  • , Hyuck Jun Yoon
  • , Yong Hwan Park
  • , Wang Soo Lee
  • Ki Hong Choi, Taek Kyu Park, Jeong Hoon Yang, Seung Hyuk Choi, Hyeon Cheol Gwon, Young Bin Song, Joo Yong Hahn, Dong Seop Jeong, Joo Myung Lee
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university
  • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
  • Chonnam National University
  • St. Francis Hospital & Heart Center, Roslyn
  • Chungbuk National University
  • Chung-Ang University
  • Wonkwang University
  • Keimyung University
  • Samsung Changwon Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the standard revascularization method for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and complex coronary artery disease. However, with significant advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), particularly the use of intravascular imaging (IVI), it is uncertain whether contemporary IVI-guided PCI can achieve clinical outcomes comparable with those of CABG. Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of IVI-guided PCI, angiography-guided PCI, and CABG in DM patients with left main or 3-vessel disease. Methods A total of 3,402 DM patients with left main or 3-vessel disease were included from individual patient-level data of the RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI (Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravascular Imaging Guidance Versus Angiography-Guidance on Clinical Outcomes After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial and the institutional registries of Samsung Medical Center (n = 6,962). The primary outcome, which was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke at 3 years was compared among IVI-guided PCI, angiography-guided PCI, and CABG. Results In the DM population, the cumulative incidence of the primary outcome at 3 years was 20.1% for angiography-guided PCI, 11.4% for IVI-guided PCI, and 12.4% for CABG. PCI was associated with a significantly higher risk for primary outcome (17.0% vs 12.4%; HR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.50-2.44; P < 0.001). However, the risk for the primary outcome was comparable between the IVI-guided PCI and CABG groups (11.4% vs 12.4%; HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.58-1.32; P = 0.525). A propensity score–matched analysis yielded similar results (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.53-1.36; P = 0.507). Conclusions In this hypothesis-generating study, PCI was associated with significantly higher risk for all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke at 3 years than CABG in DM patients with left main or 3-vessel disease. However, IVI-guided PCI had comparable risk for clinical events compared with CABG in DM patients. Further randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm this finding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)555-567
Number of pages13
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 9 Mar 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 American College of Cardiology Foundation.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • coronary artery bypass grafting
  • coronary artery disease
  • diabetes mellitus
  • intravascular ultrasound
  • percutaneous coronary intervention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Impact of Diabetes Mellitus After Intravascular Imaging–Guided PCI vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this