TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical Staging of Prostaglandin-Associated Periorbitopathy Syndrome in Glaucoma
T2 - A Review from Asia
AU - Liu, Catherine
AU - Wong, Tina
AU - Leung, Dexter
AU - Park, Hae Young Lopilly
AU - Aung, Tin
AU - Aihara, Makoto
AU - Makornwattana, Manchima
AU - Fang, Seng Kheong
AU - Park, Ki Ho
AU - Leung, Christopher
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Purpose: Topical prostaglandin analogues are commonly used to treat patients with glaucoma, but may cause periocular and periorbital complications known as prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy syndrome (PAPS). Methods: A literature review was conducted on PAPS. Given the lack of consensus on grading PAPS, glaucoma specialists from Asia convened to evaluate current PAPS grading systems and propose additional considerations in grading PAPS. Results: Existing grading systems are limited by the lack of specificity in defining grades and consideration for patients’ subjective perception of symptoms. Patient-reported symptoms (e.g., via a self-assessment tool) and additional clinical assessments (e.g., exophthalmometry, lid laxity, differences between tonometry results, baseline measurements, and external ocular photographs) would be beneficial for grading PAPS systematically. Conclusions: Effective management of PAPS could be facilitated by a common clinical grading system to consistently and accurately diagnose and characterise symptoms. Further research is required to validate specific recommendations and approaches to stage and monitor PAPS.
AB - Purpose: Topical prostaglandin analogues are commonly used to treat patients with glaucoma, but may cause periocular and periorbital complications known as prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy syndrome (PAPS). Methods: A literature review was conducted on PAPS. Given the lack of consensus on grading PAPS, glaucoma specialists from Asia convened to evaluate current PAPS grading systems and propose additional considerations in grading PAPS. Results: Existing grading systems are limited by the lack of specificity in defining grades and consideration for patients’ subjective perception of symptoms. Patient-reported symptoms (e.g., via a self-assessment tool) and additional clinical assessments (e.g., exophthalmometry, lid laxity, differences between tonometry results, baseline measurements, and external ocular photographs) would be beneficial for grading PAPS systematically. Conclusions: Effective management of PAPS could be facilitated by a common clinical grading system to consistently and accurately diagnose and characterise symptoms. Further research is required to validate specific recommendations and approaches to stage and monitor PAPS.
KW - Clinical management
KW - glaucoma
KW - grading
KW - prostaglandin analogues
KW - prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy syndrome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195267265&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08820538.2024.2361001
DO - 10.1080/08820538.2024.2361001
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38842062
AN - SCOPUS:85195267265
SN - 0882-0538
VL - 39
SP - 424
EP - 428
JO - Seminars in Ophthalmology
JF - Seminars in Ophthalmology
IS - 6
ER -