Abstract
Background: Pulling a retriever stent after several minutes of waiting time is a popular technique in mechanical thrombectomy with a stent retriever, but little data exist on the actual effects of waiting after stent deployment. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of consecutive 210 patients separated into 2 groups, a waiting after stent deployment group and a nonwaiting group. A comparative analysis was performed in terms of clinical and radiologic outcomes and complications with respect to multiple categories. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. However, compared with the nonwaiting group, the waiting group had a higher rate of one-pass procedures, a lower mean number of stent passages, and a shorter procedure time (P = 0.021, 0.014, and 0.004, respectively). The proportion of patients with successful recanalization was also higher in the waiting group (P = 0.038). In multivariate analysis, waiting after stent deployment was a predictive factor for successful recanalization (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.110–2.090; P = 0.02). Conclusions: Waiting after stent deployment can lead to a more successful recanalization with a smaller number of stent passages and less distal emboli. More randomized controlled trials are needed to support these findings.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e87-e93 |
| Journal | World Neurosurgery |
| Volume | 119 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018
Keywords
- Embolism
- Intervention
- Stent
- Stroke
- Thrombectomy
- Thrombosis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Usefulness of Waiting after Stent Deployment in Mechanical Thrombectomy: Effect of the Clot Integration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver