Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features and Prognosis According to Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Dong Hwan Kim
  • , Sang Hyun Choi
  • , Dong Wook Kim
  • , Seung Soo Lee
  • , Young Suk Lim
  • , So Yeon Kim
  • , Hyoung Jung Kim
  • , Jin Hee Kim
  • , Jae Ho Byun
  • University of Ulsan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) can develop in patients with and without risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Purpose: To compare the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of cHCC-CCA in patients with and without risk factors for HCC, and to assess the influence of risk factors on patient prognosis. Study Type: Retrospective. Population: A total of 152 patients with surgically confirmed cHCC-CCA. Field Strength/Sequence: 1.5-T and 3-T/T1-weighted dual gradient-echo in- and opposed-phase, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo, diffusion-weighted single-shot spin-echo echo-planar, and T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo contrast-enhanced sequences. Assessment: MRI features according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and pathologic findings based on revised classification were compared between patients with and without risk factors for HCC. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were also compared between the two groups, and factors associated with survival were evaluated. Statistical Tests: The clinico-pathologic and MRI features of the two groups were compared using Student's t-tests, Mann–Whitney U-tests, and chi-square tests. OS and RFS were evaluated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and factors associated with survival were evaluated by Cox proportional hazard model. Results: cHCC-CCA in patients with risk factors were more frequently classified as LI-RADS category 4 or 5 (LR-4/5; probably or definitely HCC) (48.7%), whereas those without risk factors were more frequently classified as category M (LR-M; probably malignant, not specific for HCC) (63.6%). RFS and OS did not differ significantly according to risk factors (P = 0.63 and 0.83). Multivariable analysis showed that pathologic tumor type (hazard ratio 2.02; P < 0.05) and LI-RADS category (hazard ratio 2.19; P < 0.05) were significantly associated with RFS and OS, respectively. Data Conclusion: Although MRI features of cHCC-CCA differed significantly between patients with and without risk factors for HCC, postsurgical prognosis did not. LI-RADS category and pathologic tumor type were independently correlated with postsurgical prognosis in patients with cHCC-CCA. Level of Evidence: 3. Technical Efficacy Stage: 2.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1803-1812
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume53
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Keywords

  • combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma
  • gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
  • liver
  • prognosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features and Prognosis According to Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this