Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Combined therapy with dutasteride and tadalafil vs dutasteride or tadalafil monotherapy in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomised phase III trial

  • Seung Wook Lee
  • , Seung Hwan Lee
  • , Jae Heon Kim
  • , Joon Hwa Noh
  • , Jun Ho Lee
  • , U. Syn Ha
  • , Cheol Young Oh
  • , Taek Won Kang
  • , Gyeongseop Lee
  • , Sangchul Lee
  • , Deok Hyun Han
  • , Jun Hyun Han
  • , Sang Hoon Song
  • , Hyun Jun Park
  • , Byung Ha Chung
  • , Gyeong Eun Min
  • , In Gab Jeong
  • , Kyung Hyun Moon
  • , Won Tae Kim
  • , Ji Youl Lee
  • Choung Soo Kim
  • Hanyang University
  • Yonsei University
  • Soonchunhyang University
  • Kwangju Christian Hospital
  • Eulji University
  • Hallym University
  • Chonnam National University
  • Keimyung University
  • Seoul National University
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university
  • University of Ulsan
  • Pusan National University
  • Kyung Hee University
  • Chungbuk National University
  • Ewha Womans University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of dutasteride and tadalafil vs monotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Patients and Methods: This phase III trial enrolled 667 patients. After screening and washout, eligible patients were stratified by the baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and randomised (1:1:1) to receive FDC dutasteride 0.5 mg/tadalafil 5 mg (FDC 0.5/5 mg), dutasteride 0.5 mg, or tadalafil 5 mg for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in total IPSS from baseline to Week 48. Efficacy and safety were assessed at 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks. Results: In total, 619 patients were analysed for efficacy. The least squares (LS) mean (standard error [se]) change in total IPSS at 48 weeks from baseline was −9.49 (0.37) for the FDC 0.5/5 mg group vs –4.40 (0.37) for dutasteride 0.5 mg group (LS mean difference [LSMD] –5.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] −6.13 to −4.50; P < 0.001), and −9.53 (0.36) for the FDC 0.5/5 mg group vs –4.24 (0.37) for tadalafil 5 mg group (LSMD –5.29, 95% CI −6.30 to −4.27; P < 0.001). The FDC 0.5/5 mg group demonstrated the most pronounced improvement in quality of life. Although the maximum urinary flow rate and post-void residual volume improved in all groups, differences were not statistically significant. In the comparison between the FDC 0.5/5 mg and dutasteride 0.5 mg groups, the LSMD (95% CI) of change from baseline to Week 48 in the international index of erectile function - erectile function (IIEF - EF) total score was 4.03 (2.35 to –5.71) (P < 0.05). Among the 655 patients analysed for safety, treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 32.88% (FDC 0.5/5 mg) vs 21.20% (dutasteride 0.5 mg) and 26.48% (tadalafil 5 mg), with few serious adverse events observed. Conclusions: The FDC 0.5/5 mg demonstrated superior efficacy, and an acceptable safety profile compared with dutasteride and tadalafil monotherapies in patients with BPH.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)698-707
Number of pages10
JournalBJU International
Volume137
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.

Keywords

  • LUTS
  • benign prostatic hyperplasia
  • dutasteride
  • fixed-dose combination
  • tadalafil

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Combined therapy with dutasteride and tadalafil vs dutasteride or tadalafil monotherapy in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomised phase III trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this