Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of diagnostic performance between CT and MRI for detection of cartilage invasion for primary tumor staging in patients with laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Se Jin Cho
  • , Jeong Hyun Lee
  • , Chong Hyun Suh
  • , Jung Youn Kim
  • , Donghyun Kim
  • , Jung Bin Lee
  • , Min Kyoung Lee
  • , Sae Rom Chung
  • , Young Jun Choi
  • , Jung Hwan Baek
    • University of Ulsan
    • Sungkyunkwan University
    • Inje University
    • Soonchunhyang University

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    32 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced CT with that of MRI in the detection of cartilage invasion in patients with laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer. Methods: A systematic literature search in the Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed for studies reporting diagnostic accuracy of CT and/or MRI in detecting cartilage invasion from laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer between 2000 and 2018. The pooled sensitivity and specificity, and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated for CT and MRI using bivariate random effects modeling. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed. Indirect comparison was also performed by univariable meta-regression. Result: Fourteen articles including 776 patients were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis: eight for CT, and six for MRI. CT and MRI showed pooled sensitivities of 66% (95% CI, 49–80%) and 88% (95% CI, 79–93%), and pooled specificities of 90% (95% CI, 82–94%) and 81% (95% CI, 76–84%), respectively. MRI showed significantly higher sensitivity than CT (p = 0.02). The specificities showed no statistically significant difference between CT and MRI (p = 0.39). The CT studies showed heterogeneity and a threshold effect, while MRI showed neither heterogeneity nor threshold effect. In the meta-regression analysis for CT, the type of cartilage analyzed (thyroid only vs. thyroid/cricoid/arytenoid, p < 0.001) was a significant factor influencing the heterogeneity in the diagnostic performance of the CT studies. Conclusions: In conclusion, MRI has significantly higher sensitivity than CT for detecting cartilage invasion in patients with laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer, without a significant difference in the specificity. Key Points: • MRI has significantly higher sensitivity than CT for detecting cartilage invasion in patients with laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3803-3812
    Number of pages10
    JournalEuropean Radiology
    Volume30
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1 Jul 2020

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2020, European Society of Radiology.

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Cartilage
    • Hypopharyngeal neoplasms
    • Laryngeal neoplasms
    • Magnetic resonance imaging
    • Multislice computed tomography

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of diagnostic performance between CT and MRI for detection of cartilage invasion for primary tumor staging in patients with laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this