Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of intravitreal preservative-free triamcinolone versus posterior sub-tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection for bevacizumab-resistant diabetic macular edema

  • Seung Hee Jeon
  • , Minhee Kim
  • , Young Jung Roh
  • The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital
  • Catholic University of Korea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Triamcinolone acetonide (TA) is administered as an intravitreal or posterior sub-Tenon’s capsule injection, as treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME). The intravitreal use of TA is limited because commercially available triamcinolone acetonide contains benzyl alcohol, a neurotoxic preservative. Few studies have compared effects of preservative-free intravitreal TA (IVTA) and posterior sub-Tenon capsule TA (STTA) injections for DME. Thus, herein, we compared the effectiveness of preservative-free IVTA and STTA for treatment of bevacizumab-resistant DME. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, bevacizumab-resistant DME was defined as a lack of response to at least three consecutive intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections. Changes in mean central macula thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraocular pressure (IOP) between IVTA and STTA groups were compared at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment. Results: Forty eyes from 40 patients were included in this study. In the IVTA group, the mean CMT improved significantly from 400.2 ± 144.42 μm at baseline to 288.35 ± 151.74 μm at 3 months after treatment (p = 0.01). Similarly, in the STTA group, the mean CMT improved significantly from 446.65 ± 120.74 μm at baseline to 382.9 ± 113.58 μm at 3 months after treatment (p = 0.009). The mean BCVA of the IVTA group also showed improvement, decreasing from 0.75 ± 0.55 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at baseline to 0.625 ± 0.50 logMAR at 3 months after treatment (p = 0.089). Similarly, the mean BCVA of the STTA group improved, from 0.6 ± 0.36 logMAR at baseline to 0.54 ± 0.35 logMAR at 3 months after treatment (p = 0.094). Conclusion: Given that IVTA and STTA demonstrated statistically equivalent anatomical and functional effects in patients with bevacizumab-resistant DME, the less invasive STTA may be considered the preferred treatment approach for the management of bevacizumab-resistant DME. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered.

Original languageEnglish
Article number25
JournalBMC Ophthalmology
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, The Author(s).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Bevacizumab-resistant
  • Diabetic macular edema
  • Sub-tenon’s capsule injection
  • Triamcinolone acetonide

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of intravitreal preservative-free triamcinolone versus posterior sub-tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection for bevacizumab-resistant diabetic macular edema'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this