Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Between Emergency Surgery and Bridge to Surgery for Malignant Obstruction in Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Background: Malignant obstruction in right-sided colon (MORC) has traditionally been treated by emergency resection with primary anastomosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate short-term postoperative and long-term oncologic outcomes according to the surgical approach adopted for MORC. Methods: A total of 1785 patients who underwent curative surgery for stage II or III colon cancer in seven hospitals were reviewed retrospectively. Seventy-four of 1785 patients had MORC. We compared the postoperative outcome and long-term oncologic outcome between the emergency surgery (ES) group (49 patients) and the bridge to surgery (BS) group (25 patients) for 74 patients with MORC. Results: There were no differences in the length of the distal and proximal resection margin (p = 0.820 and p = 0.620) or the number of metastatic lymph nodes (p = 0.221). There were no differences in flatus passage (p = 0.242), start of diet (p = 0.336), hospital stay (p = 0.444), or postoperative morbidity (p = 0.762). The 5-year overall survival rates were 73.2 % in the ES group and 90.7 % in the BS group (p = 0.172). Moreover, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 71.9 % in the ES group and 76.2 % in the BS group (p = 0.929). Conclusions: On the basis of the above results, the postoperative course of the ES group was similar to that of the BS group. In addition, the long-term oncologic outcome of the BS group was similar or slightly better than that of the ES group. BS after colonic stent may be an alternative option for MORC.