Abstract
Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has shown faster recovery and lower pain scores compared to Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for treatment of varicose veins. However, a comparison of 1,940-nm EVLA and RFA has not been reported. This study compared short-term outcomes using 1,940-nm EVLA and RFA for varicose veins. Methods: Between April 2018 and June 2018, 43 patients (83 incompetent saphenous veins) were treated with 1,940-nm EVLA and 37 patients (64 incompetent saphenous veins) with RFA. Follow-up duplex was checked at 1 month and 3 months. Results: Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences between both groups except for age. Pain scores at 6 h, and at 1, 10, and 30 days after treatment showed no differences. Complications and time to return to normal activity showed no differences. The 100% closure rate was checked in both groups at 1 month and 3 months follow-up. Conclusion: Short-term outcomes showed no significant differences between 1,940-nm EVLA and RFA treatment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 620034 |
| Journal | Frontiers in Surgery |
| Volume | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 11 Dec 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Copyright © 2020 Park and Park.
Keywords
- 1940 nm
- RFA
- endovenous laser ablation
- radiofrequency ablation
- varicose veins
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Endovenous 1,940-nm Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation for Incompetent Saphenous Veins'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver