TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of the BDProbeTec et system with the Roche COBAS AMPLICOR System for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in the respiratory and pleural fluid specimens
AU - Kim, Soo Young
AU - Park, Yeon Joon
AU - Kang, Seok Jin
AU - Kim, Byung Kee
AU - Kang, Chang Suk
PY - 2004/5
Y1 - 2004/5
N2 - The new BDProbeTec ET System (BDET; BD Biosciences, Sparks, MD) was compared with the Roche COBAS AMPLICOR System (CAS) and culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). A total of 253 specimens (152 respiratory and 101 pleural fluid specimens) collected from 240 patients were tested in parallel with the 3 assays. After resolving the discrepancies, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the BDET for detecting MTB was 76.9%, 93.7%, 71.4%, and 95.2% for the respiratory specimens and 88.9%, 92.4%, 53.3%, and 98.8% for the pleural fluid specimens, respectively. The corresponding values of the CAS were 69.2%, 100%, 100%, and 94% for the respiratory specimens and 33.3%, 100%, 100%, and 93.9% for the pleural fluid specimens, respectively. No significant differences in sensitivities were observed between the results of both assays for the respiratory specimens. However, statistically significant differences in sensitivities were found between the BDET and CAS for the pleural fluid specimens (P = .02). Although the BDET was less specific than the CAS (P = .007), the BDET has an excellent sensitivity for detecting MTB in the pleural fluid specimens. Considering the low sensitivity of other available tests, the BDET can be a useful diagnostic tool for excluding MTB, particularly in the pleural fluid specimens.
AB - The new BDProbeTec ET System (BDET; BD Biosciences, Sparks, MD) was compared with the Roche COBAS AMPLICOR System (CAS) and culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). A total of 253 specimens (152 respiratory and 101 pleural fluid specimens) collected from 240 patients were tested in parallel with the 3 assays. After resolving the discrepancies, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the BDET for detecting MTB was 76.9%, 93.7%, 71.4%, and 95.2% for the respiratory specimens and 88.9%, 92.4%, 53.3%, and 98.8% for the pleural fluid specimens, respectively. The corresponding values of the CAS were 69.2%, 100%, 100%, and 94% for the respiratory specimens and 33.3%, 100%, 100%, and 93.9% for the pleural fluid specimens, respectively. No significant differences in sensitivities were observed between the results of both assays for the respiratory specimens. However, statistically significant differences in sensitivities were found between the BDET and CAS for the pleural fluid specimens (P = .02). Although the BDET was less specific than the CAS (P = .007), the BDET has an excellent sensitivity for detecting MTB in the pleural fluid specimens. Considering the low sensitivity of other available tests, the BDET can be a useful diagnostic tool for excluding MTB, particularly in the pleural fluid specimens.
KW - BDProbeTec ET
KW - M. Tuberculosis
KW - Roche COBAS AMPLICOR
KW - pleural fluid
KW - respiratory
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/2342640069
U2 - 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2003.11.008
DO - 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2003.11.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 15135494
AN - SCOPUS:2342640069
SN - 0732-8893
VL - 49
SP - 13
EP - 18
JO - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
JF - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
IS - 1
ER -