TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of the Effect of Naftopidil 75 mg and Tamsulosin 0.2 mg on the Bladder Storage Symptom With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
T2 - Prospective, Multi-institutional Study
AU - Kwon, Se Yun
AU - Lee, Kyung Seop
AU - Yoo, Tag Keun
AU - Chung, Jae Il
AU - Lee, Ji Youl
AU - Hong, Jun Hyuk
AU - Seo, Seong Il
AU - Jung, Tae Young
AU - Kwak, Cheol
AU - Kang, Taek Won
AU - Yun, Seok Joong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Objective To compare the efficacies of naftopidil and tamsulosin in terms of reducing storage symptoms in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Materials and Methods This prospective randomized study was performed at 10 centers. Ninety-four patients that had been taking tamsulosin for more than 8 weeks, but had an Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) of greater than 3 points, were initially enrolled. After a 1-week washout period, patients were divided into 2 groups. Forty-five patients were treated with tamsulosin 0.2 mg daily, and 49 patients were treated with naftopidil 75 mg daily for 8 weeks. Total International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), storage symptom scores, nocturia times, OABSS, maximal flow rates (Qmax), and postvoid residual volumes were checked before and after the 8-week treatment period. Results Mean patient ages in the tamsulosin and naftopidil groups were 64.8 and 66.0 years, respectively. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different. In the tamsulosin group, mean total IPSS decreased from 19.1 to 15.1 after the 8-week treated period (P =.001), and in the naftopidil group, mean total IPSS decreased from 16.9 to 13.1 (P =.001). Mean storage symptom scores were reduced in the tamsulosin and naftopidil groups from 8.0 to 6.6 (P =.002) and from 7.6 to 6.1 (P =.001), respectively. Mean nocturia times in the naftopidil groups decreased significantly from 2.5 to 1.9 (P =.001), and mean OABSSs were reduced from 7.7 to 6.0 (P =.001) and from 7.4 to 6.0 (P =.001), respectively. Conclusion Total IPSS, storage symptom scores, nocturia times, and OABSS were significantly reduced by naftopidil and tamsulosin. Moreover, the naftopidil group showed better improvements in nocturia than the tamsulosin group.
AB - Objective To compare the efficacies of naftopidil and tamsulosin in terms of reducing storage symptoms in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Materials and Methods This prospective randomized study was performed at 10 centers. Ninety-four patients that had been taking tamsulosin for more than 8 weeks, but had an Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) of greater than 3 points, were initially enrolled. After a 1-week washout period, patients were divided into 2 groups. Forty-five patients were treated with tamsulosin 0.2 mg daily, and 49 patients were treated with naftopidil 75 mg daily for 8 weeks. Total International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), storage symptom scores, nocturia times, OABSS, maximal flow rates (Qmax), and postvoid residual volumes were checked before and after the 8-week treatment period. Results Mean patient ages in the tamsulosin and naftopidil groups were 64.8 and 66.0 years, respectively. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different. In the tamsulosin group, mean total IPSS decreased from 19.1 to 15.1 after the 8-week treated period (P =.001), and in the naftopidil group, mean total IPSS decreased from 16.9 to 13.1 (P =.001). Mean storage symptom scores were reduced in the tamsulosin and naftopidil groups from 8.0 to 6.6 (P =.002) and from 7.6 to 6.1 (P =.001), respectively. Mean nocturia times in the naftopidil groups decreased significantly from 2.5 to 1.9 (P =.001), and mean OABSSs were reduced from 7.7 to 6.0 (P =.001) and from 7.4 to 6.0 (P =.001), respectively. Conclusion Total IPSS, storage symptom scores, nocturia times, and OABSS were significantly reduced by naftopidil and tamsulosin. Moreover, the naftopidil group showed better improvements in nocturia than the tamsulosin group.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032905599&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2017.06.006
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2017.06.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 28624553
AN - SCOPUS:85032905599
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 111
SP - 145
EP - 150
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
ER -