Comportement biomécanique de différents types de suture des tendons ischio-jambiers dans la reconstruction trois brins « tout en dedans » du ligament croisé antérieur

Translated title of the contribution: Biomechanical comparison of different tendon suturing techniques for three-stranded all-inside anterior cruciate ligament grafts
  • Jae Sung Yoo
  • , Sung Jae Lee
  • , Ji Eun Jang
  • , Youngwoong Jang
  • , Chaneol Kim
  • , Yong In

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: In all-inside anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, it is usually difficult to obtain sufficient autologous semitendinosus tendon length for quadruple stranded graft in Asians, females, and those with short stature. The purpose of this study was to compare biomechanical properties of three different types of suture preparations for tripled graft and determine which method could achieve sufficient strength for ACL through in vitro study. Hypothesis: The hypothesis of this study was that suturing with a rip-stop (RS) stitch for tripled-strand graft would lead to stronger mechanical properties than suturing with buried-knot four sutures. Methods: Twenty-four bovine digital extensor tendons harvested from forelimbs were prepared for tripled-strand graft in three different ways: 1) buried-knot four sutures, 2) two RS sutures, and 3) four RS sutures. These grafts were directly connected to cylindrical metal rods of a tensile testing machine. All specimens underwent cyclic loading followed by a load-to-failure test. Preparation time, elongation, stiffness, and ultimate failure load were compared. Results: For biomechanical comparison, the group with buried-knot four sutures was excluded because six (75%) specimens failed during the cycle load test. The group with four RS sutures showed lower total elongation (two RS sutures: 8.42 ± 5.28 mm; four RS sutures: 3.86 ± 0.83 mm, p = 0.030), higher stiffness (two RS sutures: 247.28 ± 53.39 N/mm; four RS sutures: 329.27 ± 55.56 N/mm, p < 0.001), and higher ultimate failure load (two RS sutures: 567.74 ± 60.50 N; four RS sutures: 736.46 ± 32.50 N, p = 0.009). The most common failure mechanism of triple stranded graft was tendon split across sutures. Conclusion: The method with four RS sutures showed sufficient strength for triple stranded graft for all-inside ACL reconstruction without increasing preparation time. Level of evidence: III, controlled laboratory study.

Translated title of the contributionBiomechanical comparison of different tendon suturing techniques for three-stranded all-inside anterior cruciate ligament grafts
Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)702
Number of pages1
JournalRevue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Traumatologique
Volume105
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS

Keywords

  • All-inside technique
  • Anterior cruciate ligament
  • Biomechanics
  • Reconstruction
  • Triple stranded graft

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biomechanical comparison of different tendon suturing techniques for three-stranded all-inside anterior cruciate ligament grafts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this