Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study

Jae Hee Han, Hyun Gun Kim, Eu Mi Ahn, Suyeon Park, Seong Ran Jeon, Jae Myung Cha, Min Seob Kwak, Yunho Jung, Jeong Eun Shin, Hyun Deok Shin, Young Seok Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background/Aims: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) does not reflect the complete detection of every adenoma during colonoscopy; thus, many surrogate indicators have been suggested. This study investigated whether the ADR and surrogate quality indicators reflect the adenoma miss rate (AMR) when performing qualified colonoscopy. Methods: We performed a prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study of asymptomatic examinees aged 50 to 75 years who underwent back-to-back screening colonoscopies by eight endoscopists. The ADR and surrogate quality indicators, including polyp detection rate, total number of adenomas per colonoscopy, additional adenomas found after the first adenoma per colonoscopy (ADR-Plus), and total number of adenomas per positive participant, were calculated for the prediction of AMR. Results: A total of 371 back-to-back colonoscopies were performed. There was a significant difference in ADRs (range, 44% to 75.4%; p=0.024), polyp detection rates (range, 56% to 86.9%; p=0.008) and adenomas per positive participants (range, 1.19 to 2.30; p=0.038), and a tendency of a difference in adenomas per colonoscopy (range, 0.62 to 1.31; p=0.051) and ADR-Plus (range, 0.13 to 0.70; p=0.054) among the endoscopists. The overall AMR was 20.1%, and AMRs were not different (range, 13.9 to 28.6; p>0.05) among the endoscopists. No quality indicators were significantly correlated with AMR. The number of adenomas found during the first colonoscopy was an independent factor for increased AMR (odds ratio, 1.79; p<0.001). Conclusions: The colonoscopy quality indicators were significantly different among high-ADR endoscopists, and none of the quality indicators reflected the AMR of good quality colonoscopy performances. The only factor influencing AMR was the number of adenomas detected during colonoscopy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)716-725
Number of pages10
JournalGut and Liver
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund and the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases Research Fund.

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund and the Korean Association for the

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © Gut and Liver.

Keywords

  • Adenoma
  • Colonoscopy
  • Miss rate
  • Quality indicator

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this