Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: Subgroup analysis of CASTOR based on cytogenetic risk

  • Katja Weisel
  • , Andrew Spencer
  • , Suzanne Lentzsch
  • , Hervé Avet-Loiseau
  • , Tomer M. Mark
  • , Ivan Spicka
  • , Tamas Masszi
  • , Birgitta Lauri
  • , Mark David Levin
  • , Alberto Bosi
  • , Vania Hungria
  • , Michele Cavo
  • , Je Jung Lee
  • , Ajay Nooka
  • , Hang Quach
  • , Markus Munder
  • , Cindy Lee
  • , Wolney Barreto
  • , Paolo Corradini
  • , Chang Ki Min
  • Asher A. Chanan-Khan, Noemi Horvath, Marcelo Capra, Meral Beksac, Roberto Ovilla, Jae Cheol Jo, Ho Jin Shin, Pieter Sonneveld, Tineke Casneuf, Nikki Deangelis, Himal Amin, Jon Ukropec, Rachel Kobos, Maria Victoria Mateos
  • University of Hamburg
  • Monash University
  • Columbia University
  • CHU de Toulouse
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
  • Charles University
  • Semmelweis University
  • Sunderby Hospital
  • Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis
  • University of Florence
  • Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo
  • University of Bologna
  • Chonnam National University
  • Emory University
  • University of Melbourne
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital
  • Universidade de São Paulo
  • University of Milan
  • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, FL
  • Hospital Mãe de Deus
  • Ankara University
  • Hospital Angeles Lomas
  • University of Ulsan
  • Pusan National University
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC
  • Janssen Global Scientific Affairs
  • CSIC

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) patients with high cytogenetic risk have poor outcomes. In CASTOR, daratumumab plus bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-Vd) prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus bortezomib/dexamethasone (Vd) alone and exhibited tolerability in patients with relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). Methods: This subgroup analysis evaluated D-Vd versus Vd in CASTOR based on cytogenetic risk, determined using fluorescence in situ hybridization and/or karyotype testing performed locally. High-risk patients had t(4;14), t(14;16), and/or del17p abnormalities. Minimal residual disease (MRD; 10-5 sensitivity threshold) was assessed via the clonoSEQ® assay V2.0. Of the 498 patients randomized, 40 (16%) in the D-Vd group and 35 (14%) in the Vd group were categorized as high risk. Results: After a median follow-up of 40.0 months, D-Vd prolonged median PFS versus Vd in patients with standard (16.6 vs 6.6 months; HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.19-0.37; P < 0.0001) and high (12.6 vs 6.2 months; HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21-0.83; P = 0.0106) cytogenetic risk. D-Vd achieved deep responses, including higher rates of MRD negativity and sustained MRD negativity versus Vd, regardless of cytogenetic risk. The safety profile was consistent with the overall population of CASTOR. Conclusion: These updated data reinforce the effectiveness and tolerability of daratumumab-based regimens for RRMM, regardless of cytogenetic risk status. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02136134.

Original languageEnglish
Article number115
JournalJournal of Hematology and Oncology
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Aug 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Clinical trials
  • Multiple myeloma
  • Myeloma therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: Subgroup analysis of CASTOR based on cytogenetic risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this