Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Deep-Learning-Based Automated REM Sleep Detection in Patients With REM Sleep Behavior Disorder: Is It Reliable?

  • Yu Jin Jung
  • , Sunil Kim
  • , Yun Ho Choi
  • , Dong Woo Ryu
  • , Woojun Kim
  • , Seonghoon Kim
  • , Jaeseung Jeong
    • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
    • The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital
    • Catholic University of Korea
    • Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Background and Purpose Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep without atonia makes it difficult to detect REM sleep stages using electromyography in patients with REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). The objectives of this study were to propose an automated REM sleep detector that requires only electroencephalography (EEG) and electrooculography (EOG) data, and to evaluate its performance using real-world polysomnography (PSG) data in RBD patients. Methods This multicenter study used 310 PSG datasets obtained from 5 tertiary hospitals. The data were divided into RBD (n=200) and non-RBD (n=110), as well as, into Parkinson’s disease (PD) with RBD (n=76), PD without RBD (n=46), idiopathic RBD (iRBD) (n=124), and healthy controls (n=64). An automated computerized REM detection algorithm was implemented using U-Sleep’s publicly available pretrained network. Results The U-Sleep-based REM sleep-detection algorithm correctly identified REM sleep with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.90±0.14. The classification performance of the REM sleep detector differed significantly between RBD and nonRBD patients (AUC=0.88±0.13 vs. 0.93±0.14, p=0.007). The REM sleep detector accurately classified REM sleep in the order of healthy controls, PD without RBD, iRBD, and PD with RBD, with AUC values of 0.94±0.02, 0.92±0.03, 0.90±0.02, and 0.86±0.02, respectively. Conclusions Our U-Sleep-based REM sleep detector based on only EEG and EOG data showed good performance in detecting REM sleep. However, it performed considerably worse in RBD, especially in PD with RBD. Using transfer learning with fine-tuning by expert review, a high-performance REM sleep-detecting system will be realized.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)415-423
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Clinical Neurology (Korea)
    Volume21
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 2025

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2025 Korean Neurological Association.

    Keywords

    • REM sleep behavior disorder
    • REM sleep detector
    • REM sleep without atonia
    • automated algorithm

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Deep-Learning-Based Automated REM Sleep Detection in Patients With REM Sleep Behavior Disorder: Is It Reliable?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this