Determinants of clinical outcomes of gastric cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a sub-analysis of the PRODIGY study

Hyung Don Kim, Jong Seok Lee, Young Soo Park, Jeong Hwan Yook, Sung Hoon Noh, Young Kyu Park, Young Woo Kim, Sang Cheul Oh, Jong Gwang Kim, Min Hee Ryu, Jae Ho Cheong, Hyun Ki Kim, Joon Seok Lim, Jae Hyuk Lee, Suk Hee Heo, Jin Young Kim, Mi Hwa Heo, Young Iee Park, In Ho Kim, Yoon Koo Kang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: In this post hoc analysis of the PRODIGY study, we aimed to investigate factors associated with survival outcomes and provide evidence for designing optimal perioperative treatment strategies for gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and methods: A total of 212 patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group of the PRODIGY study were included as the study population. The prognostic impact of clinicopathologic factors, including the initial radiological clinical stage (cStage) and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy pathological stage (ypStage), was analyzed. Results: The median age was 58 years. The majority of patients (77.4%) had cStage III disease, and about 10% and 25% had ypStage 0 and I disease, respectively. According to the initial cStage, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly different (P < 0.01). PFS and OS were also different according to the ypStage (P < 0.01). In multivariate analyses, cStage IIIC disease (vs. cStage II) and ypStage II and III disease (vs. ypStage 0/I) were independent factors for poor survival outcomes. Based on the patterns of PFS and OS according to both cStage and ypStage, three patient groups were defined. These groups showed distinct PFS and OS (P < 0.01) with 5-year PFS rates of 95.7%, 77.9%, and 31.3% and 5-year OS rates of 95.7%, 82.4%, and 42.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Both initial cStage and ypStage were independent factors for survival outcomes of gastric cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Efforts should be made to develop optimal peri-operative treatment strategies for patients at different risks according to cStage and ypStage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1039-1049
Number of pages11
JournalGastric Cancer
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The International Gastric Cancer Association and The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

Keywords

  • Clinical stage
  • Gastric cancer
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy pathological stage

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Determinants of clinical outcomes of gastric cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a sub-analysis of the PRODIGY study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this