Abstract
Purpose To identify the differences in posterior pole profiles between early normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients with an initial central visual field (VF) loss and those with a peripheral VF loss. Methods Normal tension glaucoma patients with parafoveal scotoma (PFS; within a central 10° of fixation; superior, n = 47; inferior, n = 24) and peripheral nasal step (PNS; VF defect in the nasal meridian outside 10° of fixation; superior, n = 27; inferior, n = 32) in either hemifield were enrolled, if their mean deviation was greater than -10 decibels (dB). Disc tilt (tilt ratio), disc torsion, area of peripapillary atrophy and disc-foveal angle (angle between a horizontal line through the disc centre and the line connecting the fovea and the disc centre) were analysed from red-free fundus photographs. Results The mean disc-foveal angles (shortest diameter) in PNS and PFS groups were 6.2 ± 4.5 and 7.7 ± 4.0°, respectively. In multivariate analysis, eyes with PFS were associated with a greater disc-foveal angle, compared with PNS (p = 0.042). In subgroup analysis, superior PFS group showed greater disc-foveal angle compared with inferior PFS group (p = 0.018). In the PNS group, the direction of disc torsion was associated with superior and inferior hemifield defects (p = 0.004). Conclusions The posterior pole profiles were different in NTG patients according to their location of damage. Disc-foveal angle was the major determinant of the VF location in patients with VF loss at the central region and disc torsion in patients with loss at the peripheral region.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e94-e99 |
| Journal | Acta Ophthalmologica |
| Volume | 93 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Mar 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2014 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords
- central visual field loss
- disc torsion
- disc-foveal angle
- glaucoma
- posterior pole
- visual field location