Do Planar Tetracoordinate Fluorine Atoms Exist? Revisiting a Theoretical Prediction

Joonghan Kim, Eunji Park, Jeongmin Park, Jungyoon Kim, Wonil Seo, Dakyeung Oh, Junho Lee, Tae Kyu Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

We re-examined the existence of planar tetracoordinate F (ptF) atoms, which was proposed recently by using high-level ab initio methods such as coupled-cluster singles and doubles with perturbative triples (CCSD(T)) with large basis sets. Our calculations indicate that the planar structures of FIn4+ (D4h), FTl4+ (D4h), FGaIn3+ (C2V), FIn2Tl2+ (D2h), FIn3Tl+ (C2V), and FInTl3+ (C2V) are not the minimum energy states; by contrast, they are transition states. Density functional theory calculations overestimate the size of the cavity formed by the four peripheral atoms, leading to erroneous conclusions regarding the existence of ptF atoms. Our analysis suggests that the preference for non-planar structures in the six cations studied is not due to the pseudo Jahn-Teller effect. Additionally, spin-orbit coupling does not alter the main conclusion that the ptF atom does not exist. If sufficiently large cavity formation by group 13 elements to accommodate the central F- ion is guaranteed, then the existence of ptF atoms is plausible.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5815-5822
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry A
Volume127
Issue number28
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Jul 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Chemical Society.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do Planar Tetracoordinate Fluorine Atoms Exist? Revisiting a Theoretical Prediction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this