TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of sitagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes
AU - TECOS Study Group
AU - Green, Jennifer B.
AU - Bethel, M. Angelyn
AU - Armstrong, Paul W.
AU - Buse, John B.
AU - Engel, Samuel S.
AU - Garg, Jyotsna
AU - Josse, Robert
AU - Kaufman, Keith D.
AU - Koglin, Joerg
AU - Korn, Scott
AU - Lachin, John M.
AU - McGuire, Darren K.
AU - Pencina, Michael J.
AU - Standl, Eberhard
AU - Stein, Peter P.
AU - Suryawanshi, Shailaja
AU - de Werf, Frans Van
AU - Peterson, Eric D.
AU - Holman, Rury R.
AU - Califf, Robert M.
AU - Goldstein, Barry J.
AU - Shapiro, Deborah R.
AU - Silverman, Robert
AU - Hayden, Sarah
AU - Hannan, Karen
AU - Quintero, Kirby
AU - Rorick, Tyrus
AU - Berdan, Lisa
AU - Leloudis, Dianne
AU - Califf, Sharon
AU - Wilson, Matt
AU - Trollinger, Kathleen
AU - Pesarchick, Jean
AU - Eskenazi, Lisa
AU - Campbell, Curtis
AU - Townes, Owen
AU - Tolsma, Debra
AU - Keenan, Joanne
AU - Milton, Joanne
AU - Athwal, Rajbir
AU - Darbyshire, Julie
AU - Doran, Zoë
AU - Kennedy, Ian
AU - Gregory, Vanessa
AU - Lokhnygina, Yuliya
AU - Prather, Kristi
AU - Wolfley, Anne
AU - Usman, Muhammed
AU - Tajjar, Abdelouahid
AU - Yoo, Soon Jib
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/7/16
Y1 - 2015/7/16
N2 - BACKGROUND: Data are lacking on the long-term effect on cardiovascular events of adding sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, to usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, we assigned 14,671 patients to add either sitagliptin or placebo to their existing therapy. Open-label use of antihyperglycemic therapy was encouraged as required, aimed at reaching individually appropriate glycemic targets in all patients. To determine whether sitagliptin was noninferior to placebo, we used a relative risk of 1.3 as the marginal upper boundary. The primary cardiovascular outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.0 years, there was a small difference in glycated hemoglobin levels (least-squares mean difference for sitagliptin vs. placebo, -0.29 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.32 to -0.27). Overall, the primary outcome occurred in 839 patients in the sitagliptin group (11.4%; 4.06 per 100 person-years) and 851 patients in the placebo group (11.6%; 4.17 per 100 person-years). Sitagliptin was noninferior to placebo for the primary composite cardiovascular outcome (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.09; P<0.001). Rates of hospitalization for heart failure did not differ between the two groups (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.20; P = 0.98). There were no significant between-group differences in rates of acute pancreatitis (P = 0.07) or pancreatic cancer (P = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease, adding sitagliptin to usual care did not appear to increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, hospitalization for heart failure, or other adverse events.
AB - BACKGROUND: Data are lacking on the long-term effect on cardiovascular events of adding sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, to usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, we assigned 14,671 patients to add either sitagliptin or placebo to their existing therapy. Open-label use of antihyperglycemic therapy was encouraged as required, aimed at reaching individually appropriate glycemic targets in all patients. To determine whether sitagliptin was noninferior to placebo, we used a relative risk of 1.3 as the marginal upper boundary. The primary cardiovascular outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.0 years, there was a small difference in glycated hemoglobin levels (least-squares mean difference for sitagliptin vs. placebo, -0.29 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.32 to -0.27). Overall, the primary outcome occurred in 839 patients in the sitagliptin group (11.4%; 4.06 per 100 person-years) and 851 patients in the placebo group (11.6%; 4.17 per 100 person-years). Sitagliptin was noninferior to placebo for the primary composite cardiovascular outcome (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.09; P<0.001). Rates of hospitalization for heart failure did not differ between the two groups (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.20; P = 0.98). There were no significant between-group differences in rates of acute pancreatitis (P = 0.07) or pancreatic cancer (P = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease, adding sitagliptin to usual care did not appear to increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, hospitalization for heart failure, or other adverse events.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937053742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1501352
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1501352
M3 - Article
C2 - 26052984
AN - SCOPUS:84937053742
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 373
SP - 232
EP - 242
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 3
ER -