Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy and Safety of CT-P10 Versus Rituximab in Untreated Low-Tumor-Burden Follicular Lymphoma: Final Results of a Randomized Phase III Study

  • Larry W. Kwak
  • , Juan Manuel Sancho
  • , Seok Goo Cho
  • , Hideyuki Nakazawa
  • , Junji Suzumiya
  • , Gayane Tumyan
  • , Jin Seok Kim
  • , Tobias Menne
  • , José Mariz
  • , Nikolai Ilyin
  • , Wojciech Jurczak
  • , Aurelio Lopez Martinez
  • , Olga Samoilova
  • , Edvard Zhavrid
  • , Eduardo Yañez Ruiz
  • , Marek Trneny
  • , Leslie Popplewell
  • , Michinori Ogura
  • , Won Seog Kim
  • , Sang Joon Lee
  • Sung Hyun Kim, Keum Young Ahn, Christian Buske
  • City of Hope National Med Center
  • Generalitat de Catalunya
  • Shinshu University
  • Shimane University
  • Russian Academy of Medical Sciences - N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
  • Yonsei University
  • Newcastle University
  • Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil E.P.E.
  • Russian Ministry of Health
  • Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology
  • Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
  • Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod
  • N. N. Alexandrov Republican Scientific and Practical Centre of Oncology and Medical Radiology
  • Universidad de la Frontera
  • Charles University
  • Toni Stephenson Lymphoma Cancer Center and Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
  • Kasugai Municipal Hospital
  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • Celltrion, Inc.
  • Ulm University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: This double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled phase III trial (NCT02260804) assessed CT-P10 and rituximab safety and efficacy in patients with previously untreated low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma (LTBFL), including after a single switch from rituximab to CT-P10. Patients and Methods: LTBFL patients were randomized (1:1) to receive CT-P10 or rituximab (375 mg/m2 intravenously; day 1 of 4 7-day cycles). Patients achieving disease control entered a 2-year maintenance period. CT-P10 or rituximab were administered every 8 weeks (6 cycles) in year 1; all patients could receive CT-P10 (every 8 weeks; 6 cycles) in year 2. Secondary endpoints (reported here) were overall response rate (ORR) during the study period, progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Safety and immunogenicity were evaluated. Results: Between November 9, 2015 and January 4, 2018, 258 patients were randomized (130 for CT-P10; 128 for rituximab). ORR was similar between groups over the study period (CT-P10: 88%; rituximab: 87%). After 29.2 months’ median follow-up, median PFS, TTP, and OS were not estimable; 24-month Kaplan-Meier estimates suggested similarity between groups. Overall, 114 (CT-P10: 88%), and 104 (rituximab: 81%) patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events. The single switch was well tolerated. Conclusion: These updated data support therapeutic similarity of CT-P10 and rituximab and support the use of CT-P10 monotherapy for previously untreated LTBFL.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-97
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Biosimilar
  • Single switch
  • Therapeutic similarity
  • Time-to-event data

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and Safety of CT-P10 Versus Rituximab in Untreated Low-Tumor-Burden Follicular Lymphoma: Final Results of a Randomized Phase III Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this