Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan/Indapamide Combination Therapy versus Fimasartan Monotherapy in Patients with Essential Hypertension Inadequately Responding to Fimasartan 30 mg (FINEDUO): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase III Study

  • Jong Chan Youn
  • , So Young Lee
  • , Cheol Woong Yu
  • , Ki Chul Sung
  • , Jinho Shin
  • , Ju Hyeon Oh
  • , Jin Oh Na
  • , Dae Hee Kim
  • , Eun Joo Cho
  • , Hyuck Jun Yoon
  • , Chan Joo Lee
  • , Han Cheol Lee
  • , Hae Young Lee
  • , Il Suk Sohn
  • , Kyu Sun Lee
  • , Doo Il Kim
  • , Woong Gil Choi
  • , Wook Jin Chung
  • , Eun Mi Lee
  • , Seung Hyuk Choi
  • Seonghoon Choi, Tae Soo Kang, Sang Hyun Ihm
  • Catholic Univ. of Korea Coll. Med.
  • The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine
  • Korea University
  • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
  • Hanyang University
  • Samsung Changwon Hospital
  • University of Ulsan
  • Keimyung University
  • Yonsei University
  • Pusan National University
  • Seoul National University
  • Kyung Hee University
  • Eulji University
  • Inje University
  • Chungbuk National University
  • Gachon University
  • Dongguk University
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university
  • Hallym University
  • Dankook University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Effective blood pressure (BP) control in hypertension frequently requires combination therapy, particularly in patients whose BP is inadequately controlled by monotherapy. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of fimasartan (FMS) and indapamide (IND) sustained release (SR) combination therapy. Patients and Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, patients with hypertension who remained uncontrolled after a 4-week run-in with FMS 30 mg, were randomized to FMS 30 mg/IND SR 1.5 mg or FMS 30 mg, followed by forced titration to FMS 60 mg/IND SR 1.5 mg or FMS 60 mg after 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in sitting systolic BP (SiSBP) at week 8. Secondary endpoints included changes in sitting diastolic BP (SiDBP), BP control rates, response rates, and safety outcomes. Results: Two hundred forty-eight patients were randomized (FMS/IND SR, n=126; FMS, n=122). At week 8, the least square mean reduction in SiSBP was greater with FMS/IND SR than with FMS (−17.9 vs −7.4 mmHg, P<0.0001). Significant improvements were also observed for SiSBP at week 4, SiDBP at week 4 and 8, and BP control rates and response rates. The safety profile was comparable between groups, with no significant differences in adverse events, including patients aged 65 years and older. Conclusion: FMS/IND SR combination therapy demonstrated superior antihypertensive efficacy, rapid BP control, and comparable safety to FMS monotherapy. This regimen may serve as an effective therapeutic option, particularly in elderly or high-risk hypertensive patients. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05878561.

Original languageEnglish
Article number578736
JournalDrug Design, Development and Therapy
Volume20
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Youn et al.

Keywords

  • blood pressure control
  • combination therapy
  • fimasartan
  • hypertension
  • indapamide sustained release

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan/Indapamide Combination Therapy versus Fimasartan Monotherapy in Patients with Essential Hypertension Inadequately Responding to Fimasartan 30 mg (FINEDUO): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase III Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this