Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Therapy Versus Monotherapy with Candesartan and/or Amlodipine for Dose Finding in Essential Hypertension: A Phase II Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial

  • Il Suk Sohn
  • , Chong Jin Kim
  • , Taehoon Ahn
  • , Ho Joong Youn
  • , Hui Kyung Jeon
  • , Sang Hyun Ihm
  • , Eun Joo Cho
  • , Woo Baek Chung
  • , Shung Chull Chae
  • , Woo Shik Kim
  • , Chang Wook Nam
  • , Seong Mi Park
  • , Ji Yong Choi
  • , Young Kwon Kim
  • , Taek Jong Hong
  • , Hae Young Lee
  • , Jang Hyun Cho
  • , Eun Seok Shin
  • , Jung Han Yoon
  • , Tae Hyun Yang
  • Myung Ho Jeong, Jun Hee Lee, Joong Il Park
  • Kyung Hee University
  • Gachon University
  • Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital
  • Catholic University of Korea
  • Kyungpook National University
  • Keimyung University
  • Korea University
  • Catholic University of Daegu
  • Dongguk University
  • Pusan National University
  • Seoul National University
  • St. Carollo Hospital
  • University of Ulsan
  • Yonsei University Mirae Campus
  • Inje University
  • Chonnam National University
  • Hallym University
  • Seoul Veterans Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose Intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering is important for the treatment of hypertension; however, it has been a challenge to achieve target BP in many patients. The purpose of this study was to explore the optimal dosage of a fixed-dose combination of candesartan cilexetil (CAN) and amlodipine besylate (AML), by examining the tolerability and efficacy of CAN/AML combination therapy compared with those of monotherapy with either drug in patients with essential hypertension. Methods This Phase II multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial enrolled patients aged 19 years or older with essential hypertension, defined as a mean sitting diastolic BP (msDBP) between 95 and 115 mm Hg, and a mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) of <200 mm Hg after a 2-week placebo run-in period. A total of 635 patients were screened, of whom 439 were randomized to receive treatment; 425 patients were included in the full analysis set (combination therapy, 212; monotherapy, 213). Participants were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 8 treatments: CAN (8 or 16 mg), AML (5 or 10 mg), CAN/AML (8 mg/5 mg, 8 mg/10 mg, 16 mg/5 mg, or 16 mg/10 mg), once daily for 8 weeks. Findings After 8 weeks of treatment, changes in msDBP were significantly greater in the groups receiving CAN/AML combination therapies compared with monotherapies at matched doses, with the exception of CAN 8 mg/AML 10 mg versus AML 10 mg. The response to treatment and the achievement of target BP (both msSBP and msDBP) at week 8 were significantly greater overall in the groups that received combination therapy versus monotherapy. All medications were relatively well tolerated in each group. Implications Eight-week administration of CAN/AML (8 mg/5 mg, 16 mg/5 mg, and 16 mg/10 mg) resulted in a significantly greater BP reduction than that with CAN or AML monotherapy, and was determined to be well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02944734.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1628-1638
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Therapeutics
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017

Keywords

  • amlodipine
  • candesartan
  • combination
  • hypertension

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Therapy Versus Monotherapy with Candesartan and/or Amlodipine for Dose Finding in Essential Hypertension: A Phase II Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this