Exploring histological predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy response in non–small cell lung cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Treatment challenges persist in advanced lung cancer despite the development of therapies beyond the traditional platinum-based chemotherapy. The early 2000s marked a shift to tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting epidermal growth factor receptor, ushering in personalized genetic-based treatment. A further significant advance was the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), especially for non–small cell lung cancer. These target programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4, which enhanced the immune response against tumor cells. However, not all patients respond, and immune-related toxicities arise. This review emphasizes identifying biomarkers for ICI response prediction. While PD-L1 is a widely used, validated biomarker, its predictive accuracy is imperfect. Investigating tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tertiary lymphoid structure, and emerging biomarkers such as high endothelial venule, Human leukocyte antigen class I, T-cell immunoreceptors with Ig and ITIM domains, and lymphocyte activation gene-3 counts is promising. Understanding and exploring additional predictive biomarkers for ICI response are crucial for enhancing patient stratification and overall care in lung cancer treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-58
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Pathology and Translational Medicine
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Korean Society of Pathologists/The Korean Society for Cytopathology.

Keywords

  • Biomarkers
  • Immune-checkpoint inhibitor
  • Non-small cell lung carcinoma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring histological predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy response in non–small cell lung cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this