Fdg pet/ct findings of castleman disease assessed by histologic subtypes and compared with laboratory findings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Castleman disease (CD) is a relatively rare lymphoproliferative disorder and the pathophysiology of the subtypes are incompletely understood. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) demonstrates the metabolic activity of inflammatory and tumorous conditions. The FDG uptake intensity and sites of involved lesions on FDG PET/CT were assessed by histologic subtypes, and compared to the patient’s hemoglobin, platelet, albumin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels. In total, 60 PET/CT images of 44 consecutive CD patients were included: 4 (9%) unicentric and 40 (91%) multicentric, 21 (48%) hyaline vascular subtype, 16 (36%) plasma cell, and 7 (16%) mixed or unclassified. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumor-to-liver (T/L) ratio of involved lymph nodes (LNs) were 5.3 + 2.4 (range, 1.6–11.5) and 2.8 + 1.6 (range, 1.1–9.6), respectively, with no significant difference between the histologic subtypes. Higher number of involved LN stations and presence of extra-nodal involvement on FDG PET/CT were associated with thrombocytopenia, hypoalbuminemia, and elevated hs-CRP levels (p values < 0.05). FDG-avidity was not different by histologic subtypes and did not correlate with laboratory findings. However, the extent of nodal and extra-nodal involvement as noted on FDG PET/CT was significantly associated with abnormal laboratory findings in patients with CD.

Original languageEnglish
Article number998
JournalDiagnostics
Volume10
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the author.

Keywords

  • Castleman disease
  • FDG
  • Hypoalbuminemia
  • PET/CT
  • Thrombocytopenia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fdg pet/ct findings of castleman disease assessed by histologic subtypes and compared with laboratory findings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this