Fluoroquinolones versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

J. H. Ko, C. I. Kang, P. Cornejo-Juárez, K. M. Yeh, C. H. Wang, S. Y. Cho, M. G. Gözel, S. H. Kim, P. R. Hsueh, N. Sekiya, Y. Matsumura, D. G. Lee, S. Y. Cho, S. Shiratori, Y. J. Kim, D. R. Chung, K. R. Peck

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

82 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Fluoroquinolones are a popular alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. Objectives: To compare the effects of fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole on mortality of S. maltophilia infections. Data sources: PubMed and EMBASE. Study eligibility criteria: Clinical studies reporting mortality outcomes of S. maltophilia infections. Participants: Patients with clinical infections caused by S. maltophilia. Interventions: Fluoroquinolone monotherapy in comparison with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole monotherapy. Methods: Systematic review with meta-analysis technique. Results: Seven retrospective cohort and seven case–control studies were included. Three cohort studies were designed to compare the two drugs, whereas others had other purposes. A total of 663 patients were identified, 332 of which were treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (50.1%) and 331 with fluoroquinolones (49.9%). Three cohort studies were designed to compare the effect of the two drugs, whereas the others had other purposes. Levofloxacin was most frequently used among fluoroquinolones (187/331, 56.5%), followed by ciprofloxacin (114/331, 34.4%). The overall mortality rate was 29.6%. Using pooled ORs for the mortality of each study, fluoroquinolone treatment (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39–0.99) was associated with survival benefit over trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment, with low heterogeneity (I 2 = 18%). Specific fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.17–1.12) and levofloxacin (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48–1.26) did not show a significant difference in comparison with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In the sub-group analyses of adult and bacteraemic patients, significant differences in mortality were not observed between fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Conclusions: Based on a meta-analysis of non-randomized studies, fluoroquinolones demonstrated comparable effects on mortality of S. maltophilia infection to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, supporting the use of fluoroquinolones in clinical S. maltophilia infections. Although the pooled analysis of overall studies favoured fluoroquinolones over trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, the studies included were observational, and sub-group analyses of certain fluoroquinolone agents did not show statistical differences with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Randomized clinical studies are needed to address these issues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)546-554
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Microbiology and Infection
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

Keywords

  • Fluoroquinolone
  • Meta-analysis
  • Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
  • Systematic review
  • Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fluoroquinolones versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this