Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide for Diagnosing Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Catholic Univ. of Korea Coll. Med.
  • Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The current gold standard for diagnosing eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) is tissue biopsy, but due to its invasive nature, there is a need for clinical diagnosis in outpatient settings or presurgical evaluations. Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus up to July 2024. Review Methods: Compared the fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels between ECRS and non-ECRS patients. The risk of bias across studies was evaluated utilizing the ROBINS-I tool. Results: Twelve studies comprising 1159 participants were included. The pooled mean difference in FeNO levels between ECRS and non-ECRS patients was 32.21 ppb (95% CI: [19.36, 45.06], P <.001). The diagnostic odds ratio for FeNO in identifying ECRS was 8.78 (95% CI: [5.70, 13.51], P <.001). Conclusion: FeNO levels are significantly elevated in ECRS patients compared to non-ECRS patients. The high diagnostic odds ratio suggests that FeNO has potential as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for ECRS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)593-600
Number of pages8
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume174
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.

Keywords

  • diagnosis
  • eosinophils
  • fractional exhaled nitric oxide testing
  • rhinosinusitis
  • systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide for Diagnosing Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this