Abstract
Objective: The current gold standard for diagnosing eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) is tissue biopsy, but due to its invasive nature, there is a need for clinical diagnosis in outpatient settings or presurgical evaluations. Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus up to July 2024. Review Methods: Compared the fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels between ECRS and non-ECRS patients. The risk of bias across studies was evaluated utilizing the ROBINS-I tool. Results: Twelve studies comprising 1159 participants were included. The pooled mean difference in FeNO levels between ECRS and non-ECRS patients was 32.21 ppb (95% CI: [19.36, 45.06], P <.001). The diagnostic odds ratio for FeNO in identifying ECRS was 8.78 (95% CI: [5.70, 13.51], P <.001). Conclusion: FeNO levels are significantly elevated in ECRS patients compared to non-ECRS patients. The high diagnostic odds ratio suggests that FeNO has potential as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for ECRS.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 593-600 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery |
| Volume | 174 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.
Keywords
- diagnosis
- eosinophils
- fractional exhaled nitric oxide testing
- rhinosinusitis
- systematic review
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide for Diagnosing Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver