TY - JOUR
T1 - Gastrointestinal leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma
T2 - CT differentiation
AU - Chun, Ho Jong
AU - Byun, Jae Young
AU - Chun, Kyung Ah
AU - Rha, Sung Eun
AU - Jung, Seung Eun
AU - Lee, Jae Mun
AU - Shinn, Kyung Sub
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - Purpose: Our goal was to evaluate CT efficacy in differentiating gastrointestinal leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma. Method: We retrospectively reviewed CT scans of 45 patients (21 men, 24 women, mean age 55 years) with surgically proven gastrointestinal leiomyomas (n = 21) and leiomyosarcomas (n = 24) with respect to size, contour, enhancing pattern, mesenteric fat infiltration, calcification, ulceration, regional lymphadenopathy, direct invasion, distant metastasis, and growth pattern after visual inspection by two radiologists in agreement. On the basis of these CT features, subjective diagnosis was also categorized into three groups (Group I: probably benign, Group II: probably malignant, Group III: diagnostic malignant). The results were compared with the final histopathologic diagnosis. Results: In addition to the features of direct invasion and distant metastasis suggesting diagnostic malignancy, the CT features favoring malignancy with statistical significance included larger size (>5 cm), lobulated contour, heterogeneous enhancement, mesenteric fat infiltration, ulceration, regional lymphadenopathy, and exophytic growth pattern (p < 0.005). However, calcification was not significant in differentiating the two entities (p = 0.25163). A subjective analysis revealed 89% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and 87% accuracy for diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma. Conclusion: CT features are useful in differentiating leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma in gastrointestinal tract.
AB - Purpose: Our goal was to evaluate CT efficacy in differentiating gastrointestinal leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma. Method: We retrospectively reviewed CT scans of 45 patients (21 men, 24 women, mean age 55 years) with surgically proven gastrointestinal leiomyomas (n = 21) and leiomyosarcomas (n = 24) with respect to size, contour, enhancing pattern, mesenteric fat infiltration, calcification, ulceration, regional lymphadenopathy, direct invasion, distant metastasis, and growth pattern after visual inspection by two radiologists in agreement. On the basis of these CT features, subjective diagnosis was also categorized into three groups (Group I: probably benign, Group II: probably malignant, Group III: diagnostic malignant). The results were compared with the final histopathologic diagnosis. Results: In addition to the features of direct invasion and distant metastasis suggesting diagnostic malignancy, the CT features favoring malignancy with statistical significance included larger size (>5 cm), lobulated contour, heterogeneous enhancement, mesenteric fat infiltration, ulceration, regional lymphadenopathy, and exophytic growth pattern (p < 0.005). However, calcification was not significant in differentiating the two entities (p = 0.25163). A subjective analysis revealed 89% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and 87% accuracy for diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma. Conclusion: CT features are useful in differentiating leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma in gastrointestinal tract.
KW - Computed tomography
KW - Gastrointestinal tract, diseases
KW - Gastrointestinal tract, neoplasms
KW - Leiomyoma
KW - Leiomyosarcoma
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0345404346
U2 - 10.1097/00004728-199801000-00012
DO - 10.1097/00004728-199801000-00012
M3 - Article
C2 - 9448764
AN - SCOPUS:0345404346
SN - 0363-8715
VL - 22
SP - 69
EP - 74
JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
IS - 1
ER -