Gilteritinib as Post-Transplant Maintenance for AML with Internal Tandem Duplication Mutation of FLT3

Mark J. Levis, Mehdi Hamadani, Brent Logan, Richard J. Jones, Anurag K. Singh, Mark Litzow, John R. Wingard, Esperanza B. Papadopoulos, Alexander E. Perl, Robert J. Soiffer, Celalettin Ustun, Masumi Ueda Oshima, Geoffrey L. Uy, Edmund K. Waller, Sumithra Vasu, Melhem Solh, Asmita Mishra, Lori Muffly, Hee Je Kim, Jan Henrik MikeschYuho Najima, Masahiro Onozawa, Kirsty Thomson, Arnon Nagler, Andrew H. Wei, Guido Marcucci, Nancy L. Geller, Nahla Hasabou, David Delgado, Matt Rosales, Jason Hill, Stanley C. Gill, Rishita Nuthethi, Denise King, Heather Wittsack, Adam Mendizabal, Steven M. Devine, Mary M. Horowitz, Yi Bin Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSEAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) improves outcomes for patients with AML harboring an internal tandem duplication mutation of FLT3 (FLT3-ITD) AML. These patients are routinely treated with a FLT3 inhibitor after HCT, but there is limited evidence to support this. Accordingly, we conducted a randomized trial of post-HCT maintenance with the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02997202) to determine if all such patients benefit or if detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) could identify those who might benefit.METHODSAdults with FLT3-ITD AML in first remission underwent HCT and were randomly assigned to placebo or 120 mg once daily gilteritinib for 24 months after HCT. The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and the effect of MRD pre- and post-HCT on RFS and OS.RESULTSThree hundred fifty-six participants were randomly assigned post-HCT to receive gilteritinib or placebo. Although RFS was higher in the gilteritinib arm, the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR], 0.679 [95% CI, 0.459 to 1.005]; two-sided P =.0518). However, 50.5% of participants had MRD detectable pre- or post-HCT, and, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, gilteritinib was beneficial in this population (HR, 0.515 [95% CI, 0.316 to 0.838]; P =.0065). Those without detectable MRD showed no benefit (HR, 1.213 [95% CI, 0.616 to 2.387]; P =.575).CONCLUSIONAlthough the overall improvement in RFS was not statistically significant, RFS was higher for participants with detectable FLT3-ITD MRD pre- or post-HCT who received gilteritinib treatment. To our knowledge, these data are among the first to support the effectiveness of MRD-based post-HCT therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1766-1775
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume42
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 May 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gilteritinib as Post-Transplant Maintenance for AML with Internal Tandem Duplication Mutation of FLT3'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this