Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How best to combine DWI and T2WI to predict pathologic complete response: a multi-center study on interpreting MRI following chemoradiotherapy of rectal cancer

  • Hae Young Kim
  • , Nieun Seo
  • , Soon Nam Oh
  • , Sung Kyoung Moon
  • , Chul Min Lee
  • , Jong Keon Jang
  • , Bohyun Kim
  • , Seung Hyun Cho
  • , Jun Seok Park
  • , Seong Ho Park
  • , Joon Seok Lim
    • University of Ulsan
    • Yonsei University
    • Catholic Univ. of Korea Coll. Med.
    • Kyung Hee University
    • Hanyang University
    • Kyungpook National University

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Objectives: To explore the different criteria of integrating diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) of rectal cancer on post-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) MRI. Materials and methods: In this multi-center retrospective study, five radiologists reviewed pre- and post-CRT MRIs of patients with rectal cancer diagnosed in 2017–2021. In addition to mrTRG, three criteria were assessed: “AND” criterion (mrTRG 1–2 and absence of DWI restriction considered as CR), “OR” criterion (mrTRG 1–2 or absence of restriction), and a modified MR tumor regression grade (modMR-TRG). A crossed random effects model was used to pool sensitivity and specificity across five radiologists. F1 score and positive predictive value (PPV) were analyzed across varying pCR rates. Results: In 146 patients (median age [IQR], 63 [57–70] years; 87 men), the AND criterion yielded higher specificity (77.4% [63.3–80.0%] vs 75.3% [60.5–79.0%], p = 0.001) without significant difference in sensitivity (63.9% [42.8–75.3%] vs 67.5% [45.3–76.0%], p = 0.063) compared with mrTRG. OR criterion yielded higher sensitivity (86.1% [65.3–89.3%]; p < 0.001) but lower specificity (49.5% [36.2–62.6%]; p < 0.001). The modMR-TRG demonstrated similar effects to the OR criterion. Assuming a 20% pCR rate, PPV and F1 score of the AND criterion (point estimate of 41.4% and 50.3%, respectively) were higher than those of the OR criterion (PPV, 29.9%; F1 score, 44.4%), although the difference diminished with increasing pCR rate. Conclusion: The AND criterion—which utilizes DWI complementarily to further exclude patients with residual tumors after initial screening on T2WI—should be preferred over other criteria giving greater emphasis on DWI. Key Points: Question How should diffusion-weighted images be combined with T2-weighted images in predicting complete tumor response of rectal cancer on MRI following CRT? Findings Compared to mrTRG, the AND criterion yielded higher specificity without a significant difference in sensitivity, while the OR and modMR-TRG criteria yielded higher sensitivity but lower specificity. Clinical relevance Our study explores practical strategies for integrating DWI with T2WI that can be applied in daily practice. The AND criterion by using DWI conservatively is preferred over OR criteria, which results in a disproportionately higher number of additional false-positives than additional true-positives.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1517-1527
    Number of pages11
    JournalEuropean Radiology
    Volume36
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Feb 2026

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2025.

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Chemoradiotherapy
    • Complete tumor response
    • Diffusion-weighted imaging
    • Rectal cancer

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How best to combine DWI and T2WI to predict pathologic complete response: a multi-center study on interpreting MRI following chemoradiotherapy of rectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this