Impact of the Reconstruction Material on the Patency of Middle Hepatic Vein in Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using the Right Liver

Background: A right liver graft with middle hepatic vein (MHV) reconstruction is the standard graft for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The patency of reconstructed MHV affects the recovery and regeneration of graft. The aim of the study is to evaluate the patency rate of reconstructed MHV according to the reconstruction material in LDLT using the right liver. Methods: The data was collected retrospectively on 521 patients who underwent LDLT with right liver graft form August 2003 to December 2012 at the Seoul St. Mary's Hospital in Seoul. Two serial comparisons were performed. At first, patients were divided into 2 groups: biologic graft group (n = 252) and synthetic graft group (n = 177). Second, patients were divided into 6 groups: No MHV reconstruction (n = 92); MHV was reconstructed by greater saphenous vein (GSV) (n = 20); recipient's portal vein (PV) (n = 219); cryopreserved iliac artery (CIA) (n = 2); cryopreserved iliac vein (CIV) (n = 11); polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft (n = 105); and polyethylene terephthalate (PETE) graft (n = 72). We compared the patency of reconstructed MHV among these groups by computed tomography angiography at 7 days, 20 days, 90 days, and 1 year. Results: At the first comparison, the patency rate of the biologic graft group on the seventh postoperative day was 61.9%, and the synthetic graft group was 72.4% (P = .029). At postoperative 1 year, the patency rate of the biologic graft group was 42.9%, and the synthetic graft group was 24.1% (P = .001). At the second comparison, the MHV patency of GSV, PV, CIA, CIV, PTFE, and PETE was 65.0%, 62.5%, 50%, 63.6%, 75%, 72% on the seventh postoperative days (P = .318); 60%, 57.1%, 50%, 54.5%, 69%, 55.6% on the 20th postoperative days (P = .444); 40%, 48.8%, 50%, 27.3%, 47%, 34.1% on the 90th postoperative days (P = .294); and 30%, 45.2%, 50%, 27.3%, 27%, 26.4% at 1 postoperative year (P = .008). Conclusion: Although there was no statistical difference in comparison of each material, there were significant differences in MHV patency rates between the biologic and the synthetic group. Therefore, the synthetic graft could be considered in living donor liver transplantation with MHV reconstruction.