Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Incidence of posterolateral and retrorenal colon in supine and prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy

  • The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Colon injury is a distressing complication during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Posterolateral colon (PLC) and retrorenal colon (RRC) are known to be the risk factors of colonic injury during PCNL. We evaluated the incidence of PLC and RRC in both supine and prone position of patients who underwent PCNL in our institution, and determined the risk factors of PLC and RRC through a review of computed tomography (CT) scan. To define PLC and RRC, we divided kidney into anterior, anterolateral, posterolateral and retrorenal zone by drawing three parallel lines in the CT scan. Among a total of 102 patients, PLC and RRC were identified in 16 (15.7%) cases in supine, and 25 (24.5%) cases in the prone position. PLC and RRC were most frequently present in the upper and lower pole of the left kidney in prone position compared to supine (p value less than 0.001). Risk factors of PLC and RRC in the prone position were old age (over 68), lower body mass index (BMI), and thinner perirenal fat layer. Therefore, an initial percutaneous puncture in PCNL needs to be carefully accessed to those patients with such high risks of colon injury.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)585-590
Number of pages6
JournalUrolithiasis
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

  • Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • Posterolateral colon
  • Prone
  • Retrorenal colon
  • Supine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Incidence of posterolateral and retrorenal colon in supine and prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this