Indications, knives, and electric current: What's the best?

  • Bo In Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed to overcome the limitations of conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and ESD has been also applied for large colorectal neoplasms. Since colorectal ESD is still associated with higher perforation rate, a longer procedure time, and increased technical difficulty, the indications should be strictly considered. Generally, colorectal tumors without deep submucosal invasion or minimal possibility of lymph node metastasis, for which en bloc resection using conventional EMR is difficult, are good candidates for colorectal ESD. The ideal knife for colorectal ESD should avoid making perforations but can make a clean cut of optimal depth at one time. The ideal current for ESD differs depending on the procedure used, the surgical devices used, the tissue to be dissected, and the operator's preference. Application of the optimal indications and improvements in the technical skill and surgical devices are required for easier and safer colorectal ESD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285-287
Number of pages3
JournalClinical Endoscopy
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Keywords

  • Colonoscopy
  • Colorectal neoplasms
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Indications, knives, and electric current: What's the best?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this