Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Induced neural stem cells from distinct genetic backgrounds exhibit different reprogramming status

  • Sung Min Kim
  • , Kyung Tae Lim
  • , Tae Hwan Kwak
  • , Seung Chan Lee
  • , Jung Hyun Im
  • , Sai Hali
  • , Seon In Hwang
  • , Dajeong Kim
  • , Jeongho Hwang
  • , Kee Pyo Kim
  • , Hak Jae Chung
  • , Jeong Beom Kim
  • , Kinarm Ko
  • , Hyung Min Chung
  • , Hoon Taek Lee
  • , Hans R. Schöler
  • , Dong Wook Han
  • Konkuk University
  • Dong-A Socio Holdings Research Center
  • United States Food and Drug Administration
  • Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology
  • Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine
  • University of Münster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Somatic cells could be directly converted into induced neural stem cells (iNSCs) by ectopic expression of defined transcription factors. However, the underlying mechanism of direct lineage transition into iNSCs is largely unknown. In this study, we examined the effect of genetic background on the direct conversion process into an iNSC state. The iNSCs from two different mouse strains exhibited the distinct efficiency of lineage conversion as well as clonal expansion. Furthermore, the expression levels of endogenous NSC markers, silencing of transgenes, and in vitro differentiation potential were also different between iNSC lines from different strains. Therefore, our data suggest that the genetic background of starting cells influences the conversion efficiency as well as reprogramming status of directly converted iNSCs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)460-468
Number of pages9
JournalStem Cell Research
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016.

Keywords

  • Cell fate transition
  • Direct conversion
  • Direct reprogramming
  • Genetic backgrounds
  • INSCs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Induced neural stem cells from distinct genetic backgrounds exhibit different reprogramming status'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this