Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Intereye structure–function relationship using photopic negative response in patients with glaucoma or glaucoma suspect

  • Catholic Univ. of Korea Coll. Med.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

We evaluated the intereye structure–function relationship in glaucoma patients using photopic negative response in electroretinogram analysis. Patients with confirmed glaucoma (36 eyes, 36 patients) or suspected glaucoma (19 eyes, 19 patients) were included in this study. Electroretinogram (RETI-scan) was performed with red stimulus on blue background. Intereye comparison for 55 patients was performed between better eyes and worse eyes, which were divided based on average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. In the intereye analysis, PhNR amplitude was lower in worse eyes than in better eyes (P < 0.001). The intereye difference in PhNR amplitude was significantly correlated with intereye difference in average RNFL, as well as average or minimum ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness (P = 0.006, 0.044, 0.001). In patients with mean deviation ≥ − 6 dB of worse eyes, the intereye difference in PhNR amplitude was significantly associated with intereye difference in average RNFL thickness or minimum GCIPL thickness (P = 0.037, 0.007), but significant correlation was not found between mean sensitivity of visual field tests and structural parameters. In conclusion, PhNR performed well with regard to intereye structure–function association in glaucoma patients, especially at the early stage.

Original languageEnglish
Article number13866
JournalScientific Reports
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intereye structure–function relationship using photopic negative response in patients with glaucoma or glaucoma suspect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this