Is a Drain Necessary Routinely After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for an Acutely Inflamed Gallbladder? A Retrospective Analysis of 457 Cases

Eun Young Kim, Young Kyoung You, Dong Goo Kim, Soo Ho Lee, Jae Hyun Han, Sung Kyun Park, Gun Hyung Na, Tae Ho Hong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: During laparoscopic surgery for an acutely inflamed gallbladder, most surgeons routinely insert a drain. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the need for drainage in these cases, and the use of a drain remains controversial. Methods: This retrospective study divided 457 cases into two groups according to whether or not a drain was inserted and reviewed the surgical outcomes and perioperative morbidity. Results: In this study, 231 patients had no drains and 226 had drains. Both groups were comparable in terms of pathology, demographics, and operative details. There was no statistical difference in operating time, visual analog scale for pain, or postoperative hospital stay. Morbidity occurred in 49 cases (10.7 %) and did not differ significantly between the two groups. No mortality occurred in this study. Conclusions: The routine use of a drain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for an acutely inflamed gallbladder had no effect on the postoperative morbidity. Therefore, this retrospective study supports that it is feasible not to insert a drain routinely in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients who have an acutely inflamed gallbladder.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)941-946
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2014

Keywords

  • Acute cholecystitis
  • Drain
  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Morbidity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is a Drain Necessary Routinely After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for an Acutely Inflamed Gallbladder? A Retrospective Analysis of 457 Cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this