Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is minimally invasive radical surgery safe for patients with cervical cancer ≤2 cm in size? (MISAFE): Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLborAtion study (GORILLA-1003)

  • Tae Wook Kong
  • , Jeeyeon Kim
  • , Joo Hyuk Son
  • , A. Jin Lee
  • , Eun Jung Yang
  • , Seung Hyuk Shim
  • , Nam Kyeong Kim
  • , Yeorae Kim
  • , Dong Hoon Suh
  • , Dong Won Hwang
  • , Soo Jin Park
  • , Hee Seung Kim
  • , Yoo Young Lee
  • , Ji Geun Yoo
  • , Sung Jong Lee
  • , Suk Joon Chang
  • Ajou University
  • Konkuk University
  • Seoul National University
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To identify clinicopathological factors associated with disease recurrence for patients with 2018 FIGO stage IA with lymphovascular invasion to IB1 cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Methods: A total of 722 patients with cervical cancer between January 2010 and February 2021 were identified. Clinicopathological factors related to disease recurrence were analyzed. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. To determine prognostic factors for DFS, a Cox proportional hazard regression model was used. Results: Of 722 patients, 49 (6.8%) experienced disease recurrence (37 pelvis, 1 para-aortic lymph node, and 11 peritoneum). Five-year DFS and OS rates were 90.7% and 98.1%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, risk factors associated with disease recurrence were residual disease in the remaining cervix (OR, 3.122; 95% CI, 1.152–8.461; p = 0.025), intracorporeal colpotomy (OR, 3.252; 95% CI, 1.507–7.017; p = 0.003), and positive resection margin (OR, 3.078; 95% CI, 1.031–9.193; p = 0.044). The non-conization group had a higher percentage of stage IB1 (77.4% vs. 64.6%; p = 0.004) and larger tumor (10 mm vs. 7 mm; p < 0.001) than the conization group. Intracorporeal colpotomy and residual disease in the remaining cervix were independent variables associated with disease recurrence in patients undergoing MIS following conization. Conclusion: During MIS, patients with cervical cancer ≤2 cm in size can be vulnerable to peritoneal recurrences. Patients diagnosed with invasive cancer through conization often have low-risk pathological features, which may affect their survival outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)122-129
Number of pages8
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume176
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Inc.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Cervical cancer
  • Colpotomy
  • Conization
  • Disease recurrence
  • Minimally invasive surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is minimally invasive radical surgery safe for patients with cervical cancer ≤2 cm in size? (MISAFE): Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLborAtion study (GORILLA-1003)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this