Is minimally invasive radical surgery safe for patients with cervical cancer ≤2 cm in size? (MISAFE): Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLborAtion study (GORILLA-1003)

Tae Wook Kong, Jeeyeon Kim, Joo Hyuk Son, A. Jin Lee, Eun Jung Yang, Seung Hyuk Shim, Nam Kyeong Kim, Yeorae Kim, Dong Hoon Suh, Dong Won Hwang, Soo Jin Park, Hee Seung Kim, Yoo Young Lee, Ji Geun Yoo, Sung Jong Lee, Suk Joon Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To identify clinicopathological factors associated with disease recurrence for patients with 2018 FIGO stage IA with lymphovascular invasion to IB1 cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Methods: A total of 722 patients with cervical cancer between January 2010 and February 2021 were identified. Clinicopathological factors related to disease recurrence were analyzed. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. To determine prognostic factors for DFS, a Cox proportional hazard regression model was used. Results: Of 722 patients, 49 (6.8%) experienced disease recurrence (37 pelvis, 1 para-aortic lymph node, and 11 peritoneum). Five-year DFS and OS rates were 90.7% and 98.1%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, risk factors associated with disease recurrence were residual disease in the remaining cervix (OR, 3.122; 95% CI, 1.152–8.461; p = 0.025), intracorporeal colpotomy (OR, 3.252; 95% CI, 1.507–7.017; p = 0.003), and positive resection margin (OR, 3.078; 95% CI, 1.031–9.193; p = 0.044). The non-conization group had a higher percentage of stage IB1 (77.4% vs. 64.6%; p = 0.004) and larger tumor (10 mm vs. 7 mm; p < 0.001) than the conization group. Intracorporeal colpotomy and residual disease in the remaining cervix were independent variables associated with disease recurrence in patients undergoing MIS following conization. Conclusion: During MIS, patients with cervical cancer ≤2 cm in size can be vulnerable to peritoneal recurrences. Patients diagnosed with invasive cancer through conization often have low-risk pathological features, which may affect their survival outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)122-129
Number of pages8
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume176
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Inc.

Keywords

  • Cervical cancer
  • Colpotomy
  • Conization
  • Disease recurrence
  • Minimally invasive surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is minimally invasive radical surgery safe for patients with cervical cancer ≤2 cm in size? (MISAFE): Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLborAtion study (GORILLA-1003)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this