Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Justification of CT for Individual Health Assessment of Asymptomatic Persons: A World Health Organization Consultation

  • Jim Malone
  • , Maria del Rosario Perez
  • , Eva Godske Friberg
  • , Mathias Prokop
  • , Seung Eun Jung
  • , Jurgen Griebel
  • , Steve Ebdon-Jackson
    • St James’s Hospital
    • World Health Organization
    • Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority
    • Radboud University Nijmegen
    • Federal Office for Radiation Protection
    • UK Health Security Agency

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    14 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    An international expert consultation was convened by the World Health Organization (WHO). The purpose of the meeting was to review the use of CT in examining asymptomatic people. This is often referred to as individual health assessment (IHA). IHA was identified as a global phenomenon unenthusiastically tolerated, and not actively promoted, structured, or regulated in most countries. This paper identifies the state of the art for IHA and some considerations in relation to its justification, in different regions of the world. The outcomes reached include the following: questions around terminology and culture of IHA practice; review of IHA in some countries, regions, and international bodies; dilemmas for participants in IHA; risk communication, education, and training for professions and public; the desirability of guidelines and clinical audit; social, ethical, public health, and resource considerations; and a framework for IHA and regulatory considerations. Three subcategories of examination for asymptomatic individuals were identified: formal screening programs; examinations for which the evidence base or risk profile is incomplete; and opportunistic examinations with little or no evidence or risk profile to suggest they have any merit. The latter challenges the justification principle of radiation protection. In addition, the issue of the costs, direct and indirect, associated with false positives and/or equivocal/incidental findings were highlighted. These and other considerations make it difficult to view some IHA as a bona fide medical activity. To allow it to be viewed as such requires that it be conducted within a robust clinical governance framework that includes regulatory dimensions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1447-1457.e1
    JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
    Volume13
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1 Dec 2016

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2016 The World Health Organization

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • CT scans
    • IHA
    • Radiation risk
    • WHO
    • asymptomatic
    • ethics
    • justification
    • public health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Justification of CT for Individual Health Assessment of Asymptomatic Persons: A World Health Organization Consultation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this