Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients with EGFR -Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results from LASER301

  • Byoung Chul Cho
  • , Myung Ju Ahn
  • , Jin Hyoung Kang
  • , Ross A. Soo
  • , Thanyanan Reungwetwattana
  • , James Chih Hsin Yang
  • , Irfan Cicin
  • , Dong Wan Kim
  • , Yi Long Wu
  • , Shun Lu
  • , Ki Hyeong Lee
  • , Yong Kek Pang
  • , Anastasia Zimina
  • , Chin Heng Fong
  • , Elena Poddubskaya
  • , Ahmet Sezer
  • , Soon Hin How
  • , Pongwut Danchaivijitr
  • , Yukyung Kim
  • , Yeji Lim
  • Taewon An, Hana Lee, Hae Mi Byun, Bojan Zaric
  • Yonsei University
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university
  • National University Hospital
  • Mahidol University
  • National Taiwan University
  • Trakya University
  • Seoul National University
  • Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Chungbuk National University
  • University of Malaya
  • Omsk Clinical Oncological Dispensary
  • Hospital Pulau Pinang
  • Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
  • Adana Baskent Practice and Research Hospital
  • Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan
  • Yuhan Corporation
  • University of Novi Sad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

147 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSELazertinib is a potent, CNS-penetrant, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This global, phase III study (LASER301) compared lazertinib versus gefitinib in treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion [ex19del]/L858R) locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).PATIENTS AND METHODSPatients were 18 years and older with no previous systemic anticancer therapy. Neurologically stable patients with CNS metastases were allowed. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to lazertinib 240 mg once daily orally or gefitinib 250 mg once daily orally, stratified by mutation status and race. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1.RESULTSOverall, 393 patients received double-blind study treatment across 96 sites in 13 countries. Median PFS was significantly longer with lazertinib than with gefitinib (20.6 v 9.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.58; P <.001). The PFS benefit of lazertinib over gefitinib was consistent across all predefined subgroups. The objective response rate was 76% in both groups (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.59). Median duration of response was 19.4 months (95% CI, 16.6 to 24.9) with lazertinib versus 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 10.9) with gefitinib. Overall survival data were immature at the interim analysis (29% maturity). The 18-month survival rate was 80% with lazertinib and 72% with gefitinib (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08; P =.116). Observed safety of both treatments was consistent with their previously reported safety profiles.CONCLUSIONLazertinib demonstrated significant efficacy improvement compared with gefitinib in the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4208-4217
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume41
Issue number26
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 Sep 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© American Society of Clinical Oncology.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients with EGFR -Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results from LASER301'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this