Liver imaging reporting and data system category M: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Dong Hwan Kim
  • , Sang Hyun Choi
  • , Seong Ho Park
  • , Kyung Won Kim
  • , Jae Ho Byun
  • , So Yeon Kim
  • , Seung Soo Lee
  • , Yong Moon Shin
  • , Hyung Jin Won
  • , Pyo Nyun Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Aims: The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category M (LR-M) was introduced to preserve the high specificity of LI-RADS algorithm for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to systematically determine the probability of the LR-M for HCC and non-HCC malignancy, and to determine the sources of heterogeneity between reported results. Methods: Original studies reporting the probability of LR-M for HCC and non-HCC malignancy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE. The meta-analytic pooled percentages of HCC and non-HCC in LR-M were calculated. Meta-regression analysis was performed to explore study heterogeneity. The meta-analytic frequency of each LR-M imaging feature was determined. Results: We found 10 studies reporting the diagnostic performance of LR-M (1819 lesions in 1631 patients), and six reporting the frequency of LR-M imaging features. The pooled percentages of HCC and non-HCC malignancy for LR-M were 28.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.8%-33.1%; I2 = 83%) and 69.6% (95% CI, 64.6%-74.1%; I2 = 83%) respectively. The study type and MRI scanner field strength were significantly associated with study heterogeneity (P ≤.04). Of the seven imaging features, rim arterial phase hyperenhancement showed the highest frequency in both non-HCC (48.9%; 95% CI, 43.0%-54.8%) and HCC groups (9.8%; 95% CI, 6.9%-13.6%). Conclusions: The LR-M category most commonly included non-HCC malignancy but also included 28.2% of HCC. Substantial study heterogeneity was noted, and it was significantly associated with study type and MRI scanner field strength. In addition, the frequency of LR-M imaging features was variable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1477-1487
Number of pages11
JournalLiver International
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Keywords

  • hepatocellular carcinoma; liver imaging reporting and data system; magnetic resonance imaging; systematic review; meta-analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Liver imaging reporting and data system category M: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this