Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Low-Cost Augmented Reality System in Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Analysis of Surgeon Ergonomics, Perceived Workload and A Step-by-Step Guide for Implementation

  • Facundo Van Isseldyk
  • , Piya Chavalparit
  • , Julio Bassani
  • , Lisandro Rodriguez Sattler
  • , Marcus Serra
  • , Jefferson Leal
  • , Cristian Correa Valencia
  • , Alberto Gotfryd
  • , Jeronimo Milano
  • , Alfredo Guiroy
  • , Jin Sung Kim
  • Hospital Privado de Rosario
  • Endospine Academy
  • Navamindradhiraj University
  • Catholic Univ. of Korea Coll. Med.
  • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
  • Sanatorio Cantegril
  • Santista Institute of Neurosurgery and Spine
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Universidad de la Frontera
  • Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
  • Santa Casa de São Paulo Medical School
  • Neurological Institute of Curitiba
  • Clínica de Cuyo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study Design: Prospective controlled study. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of an augmented reality (AR) visualization system on surgeon workload and ergonomics during endoscopic spine surgery, compared to conventional display monitors. Methods: Ten experienced endoscopic spine surgeons (five neurosurgeons and five orthopedic surgeons; mean age 54 years) each performed 20 surgeries: the first 10 using traditional displays and the following 10 with a novel AR system. A step-by-step guide for AR system setup and utilization is provided. Workload was assessed using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), and ergonomics were evaluated using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) score after each procedure. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare traditional and AR systems, with normality assessed via the Shapiro-Wilk test. Results: Use of the AR system resulted in significantly lower NASA-TLX scores, particularly in physical demand, effort, and performance domains (P < 0.001). RULA scores improved substantially, decreasing from a mean of 6.0 with traditional displays to 3.0 with AR (P < 0.001), indicating improved ergonomic posture. All surgeons demonstrated consistent reductions in perceived workload and ergonomic risk when utilizing the AR system. Conclusions: Integration of an AR visualization system in endoscopic spine surgery significantly reduces cognitive workload and improves ergonomic posture compared to traditional displays. These findings suggest that AR technology may enhance surgical efficiency, promote surgeon well-being, and support the long-term sustainability of minimally invasive spinal procedures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)873-883
Number of pages11
JournalGlobal Spine Journal
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

Keywords

  • augmented reality
  • endoscopic spine surgery
  • ergonomics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Low-Cost Augmented Reality System in Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Analysis of Surgeon Ergonomics, Perceived Workload and A Step-by-Step Guide for Implementation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this